TSTP Solution File: SYN694-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN694-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.37s 1.65s
% Output : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN694-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 23:47:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 1.37/1.65 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 1.37/1.65 Process 20144 was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 1.37/1.65 Mon Jul 11 23:47:08 2022
% 1.37/1.65 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_19734_n019.cluster.edu".
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_19734_n019.cluster.edu
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.37/1.65 set(auto2).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 1.37/1.65 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 1.37/1.65 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 1.37/1.65 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 1.37/1.65 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 1.37/1.65 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 1.37/1.65 assign(order,kbo).
% 1.37/1.65 set(lex_order_vars).
% 1.37/1.65 clear(print_given).
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (73 formulas)
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Term ordering decisions:
% 1.37/1.65 Function symbol KB weights: c42=1. c43=1. c44=1. c36=1. c37=1. c34=1. c46=1. c47=1. c45=1. c35=1. c38=1. c39=1. c40=1. c41=1. f11=1. f13=1. f15=1. f22=1. f23=1. f19=1. f4=1. f5=1. f9=1. f20=1. f16=1. f18=1. f24=1. f8=1.
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=4864
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3708
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3681
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 2147483647 (0.00 of 0.47 sec).
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3338
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Low Water (keep): wt=13.000, iters=3351
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Low Water (displace): id=10657, wt=11.000
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Low Water (keep): wt=12.000, iters=4115
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Low Water (displace): id=11190, wt=10.000
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 1.37/1.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.37/1.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 % Proof 1 at 0.63 (+ 0.03) seconds.
% 1.37/1.65 % Length of proof is 25.
% 1.37/1.65 % Level of proof is 6.
% 1.37/1.65 % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 1.37/1.65 % Given clauses 854.
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 7 p10(A,A) # label(p10_7) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 10 p3(A,A) # label(p3_10) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 12 p2(A,A) # label(p2_12) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 16 p10(c43,c47) # label(p10_16) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 18 p2(c44,c45) # label(p2_18) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 28 p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),f11(f4(c44),c43)) # label(p2_55) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 30 -p2(f11(f4(c45),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)) # label(not_p2_56) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 43 p3(f4(A),f4(B)) | -p2(A,B) # label(p3_36) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 44 p10(A,B) | -p10(C,A) | -p10(C,B) # label(p10_37) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 49 p2(A,B) | -p2(C,A) | -p2(C,B) # label(p2_42) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 63 p2(f11(A,B),f11(C,D)) | -p10(B,D) | -p3(A,C) # label(p2_61) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 1.37/1.65 105 p3(f4(c44),f4(c45)). [resolve(43,b,18,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 106 p10(c47,A) | -p10(c43,A). [resolve(44,b,16,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 116 p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),A) | -p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),A). [resolve(49,b,28,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 126 -p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),f11(f4(c45),c43)). [ur(49,a,30,a,c,12,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 166 p2(f11(A,B),f11(A,C)) | -p10(B,C). [resolve(63,c,10,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 240 p2(f11(f4(c44),A),f11(f4(c45),B)) | -p10(A,B). [resolve(105,a,63,c)].
% 1.37/1.65 313 p10(c47,c43). [resolve(106,b,7,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 5813 p2(f11(A,c47),f11(A,c43)). [resolve(166,b,313,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 5814 p2(f11(A,c43),f11(A,c47)). [resolve(166,b,16,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 5856 -p2(f11(f4(c45),c47),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)). [ur(49,a,126,a,c,5813,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 5875 p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c47)). [resolve(5814,a,116,b)].
% 1.37/1.65 5890 -p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c47),f11(f4(c45),c47)). [ur(49,a,5856,a,c,5813,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 10176 p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),f11(f4(c45),c47)). [resolve(240,b,16,a)].
% 1.37/1.65 11809 $F. [ur(49,a,5890,a,c,10176,a),unit_del(a,5875)].
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Given=854. Generated=40263. Kept=11808. proofs=1.
% 1.37/1.65 Usable=854. Sos=9999. Demods=0. Limbo=6, Disabled=1022. Hints=0.
% 1.37/1.65 Megabytes=9.77.
% 1.37/1.65 User_CPU=0.63, System_CPU=0.03, Wall_clock=1.
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 ============================== end of search =========================
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 THEOREM PROVED
% 1.37/1.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 1.37/1.65
% 1.37/1.65 Process 20144 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 11 23:47:09 2022
% 1.37/1.65 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------