TSTP Solution File: SYN690-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN690-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.22s 6.46s
% Output   : Refutation 6.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN690-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 07:33:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Tue Jul 12 07:33:24 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11998.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36  61 back subsumes 41.
% 0.12/0.36  62 back subsumes 42.
% 0.12/0.36  63 back subsumes 43.
% 0.12/0.36  64 back subsumes 44.
% 0.12/0.36  65 back subsumes 45.
% 0.12/0.36  66 back subsumes 46.
% 0.12/0.36  67 back subsumes 47.
% 0.12/0.36  68 back subsumes 48.
% 0.12/0.36  69 back subsumes 49.
% 0.12/0.36  70 back subsumes 50.
% 0.12/0.36  71 back subsumes 51.
% 0.12/0.36  72 back subsumes 52.
% 0.12/0.36  73 back subsumes 53.
% 0.12/0.36  74 back subsumes 60.
% 0.12/0.36  74 back subsumes 59.
% 0.12/0.36  74 back subsumes 54.
% 0.12/0.36  75 back subsumes 55.
% 0.12/0.36  76 back subsumes 56.
% 0.12/0.36  77 back subsumes 57.
% 0.12/0.36  78 back subsumes 58.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.74/1.00  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.74/1.00  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.74/1.00  number of clauses in intial UL: 40
% 0.74/1.00  number of clauses initially in problem: 62
% 0.74/1.00  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 64
% 0.74/1.00  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 67
% 0.74/1.00  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.74/1.00  absolute distinct symbol count: 68
% 0.74/1.00     distinct predicate count: 20
% 0.74/1.00     distinct function count: 14
% 0.74/1.00     distinct constant count: 34
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  
% 0.74/1.00  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.54/2.79  
% 2.54/2.79  
% 2.54/2.79  Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 2.54/2.79  
% 2.54/2.79  Resetting weight limit to 59 after 280 givens.
% 2.54/2.79  
% 2.82/3.03  
% 2.82/3.03  
% 2.82/3.03  Changing weight limit from 59 to 55.
% 2.82/3.03  
% 2.82/3.03  Resetting weight limit to 55 after 290 givens.
% 2.82/3.03  
% 2.92/3.19  
% 2.92/3.19  
% 2.92/3.19  Changing weight limit from 55 to 52.
% 2.92/3.19  
% 2.92/3.19  Resetting weight limit to 52 after 295 givens.
% 2.92/3.19  
% 3.13/3.39  
% 3.13/3.39  
% 3.13/3.39  Changing weight limit from 52 to 48.
% 3.13/3.39  
% 3.13/3.39  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 3.13/3.39  
% 3.13/3.39  
% 3.13/3.39  Resetting weight limit to 48 after 305 givens.
% 3.13/3.39  
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  Changing weight limit from 48 to 46.
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.53/3.73  Resetting weight limit to 46 after 320 givens.
% 3.53/3.73  
% 3.71/3.96  
% 3.71/3.96  
% 3.71/3.96  Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 3.71/3.96  
% 3.71/3.96  Resetting weight limit to 45 after 325 givens.
% 3.71/3.96  
% 4.23/4.46  
% 4.23/4.46  
% 4.23/4.46  Changing weight limit from 45 to 43.
% 4.23/4.46  
% 4.23/4.46  Resetting weight limit to 43 after 330 givens.
% 4.23/4.46  
% 4.75/4.94  
% 4.75/4.94  
% 4.75/4.94  Changing weight limit from 43 to 42.
% 4.75/4.94  
% 4.75/4.94  Resetting weight limit to 42 after 335 givens.
% 4.75/4.94  
% 4.91/5.13  
% 4.91/5.13  
% 4.91/5.13  Changing weight limit from 42 to 41.
% 4.91/5.13  
% 4.91/5.13  Resetting weight limit to 41 after 345 givens.
% 4.91/5.13  
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 6.22/6.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.22/6.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   6.05 sec ----> 7808 [binary,7807.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 4.
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 6.22/6.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.22/6.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  1 [] {+} -p2(c38,c40).
% 6.22/6.46  36 [] {+} p4(f5(f7(c39,A),B),f5(f7(c39,C),B))| -p4(f5(A,f12(f14(f16(c41,A),C),B)),f5(C,f12(f14(f16(c41,A),C),B))).
% 6.22/6.46  39 [] {+} p2(A,B)|p4(f5(f26(f28(c43,C),D),E),f5(f26(f28(c44,C),D),E))| -p34(c36,C)| -p35(f10(C,E),f30(f32(c42,C),D))| -p4(f5(A,f18(f20(f22(f24(c45,C),D),A),B)),f5(f7(D,A),f18(f20(f22(f24(c45,C),D),A),B)))| -p4(f5(B,f18(f20(f22(f24(c45,C),D),A),B)),f5(f7(D,B),f18(f20(f22(f24(c45,C),D),A),B))).
% 6.22/6.46  40 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p34(c36,C)| -p4(f5(A,f18(f20(f22(f24(c45,C),D),A),B)),f5(f7(D,A),f18(f20(f22(f24(c45,C),D),A),B)))| -p4(f5(B,f18(f20(f22(f24(c45,C),D),A),B)),f5(f7(D,B),f18(f20(f22(f24(c45,C),D),A),B)))| -p4(f5(f7(D,f26(f28(c43,C),D)),f30(f32(c42,C),D)),f5(f7(D,f26(f28(c44,C),D)),f30(f32(c42,C),D))).
% 6.22/6.46  79 [] {-} p34(c36,c37).
% 6.22/6.46  80 [] {-} p4(f5(c40,A),f5(f7(c39,c40),A)).
% 6.22/6.46  81 [] {-} p4(f5(c38,A),f5(f7(c39,c38),A)).
% 6.22/6.46  82 [] {-} p4(f5(f7(c39,A),B),f5(f7(c39,C),B))|p35(f10(c37,f12(f14(f16(c41,A),C),B)),B).
% 6.22/6.46  96 [hyper,82,40,79,81,80,unit_del,1] {-} p35(f10(c37,f12(f14(f16(c41,f26(f28(c43,c37),c39)),f26(f28(c44,c37),c39)),f30(f32(c42,c37),c39))),f30(f32(c42,c37),c39)).
% 6.22/6.46  164 [hyper,96,39,79,81,80,unit_del,1] {-} p4(f5(f26(f28(c43,c37),c39),f12(f14(f16(c41,f26(f28(c43,c37),c39)),f26(f28(c44,c37),c39)),f30(f32(c42,c37),c39))),f5(f26(f28(c44,c37),c39),f12(f14(f16(c41,f26(f28(c43,c37),c39)),f26(f28(c44,c37),c39)),f30(f32(c42,c37),c39)))).
% 6.22/6.46  2751 [hyper,164,36] {-} p4(f5(f7(c39,f26(f28(c43,c37),c39)),f30(f32(c42,c37),c39)),f5(f7(c39,f26(f28(c44,c37),c39)),f30(f32(c42,c37),c39))).
% 6.22/6.46  7807 [hyper,2751,40,79,81,80] {-} p2(c38,c40).
% 6.22/6.46  7808 [binary,7807.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.22/6.46  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  ============ end of search ============
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 6.22/6.46  
% 6.22/6.46  Process 11998 finished Tue Jul 12 07:33:30 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------