TSTP Solution File: SYN684-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN684-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 10:22:44 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_31,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A3kbNXfos3/E---3.1_12418.p',p2_31) ).
cnf(p2_51,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))
| ~ p25(X1,c36)
| ~ p25(c32,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A3kbNXfos3/E---3.1_12418.p',p2_51) ).
cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A3kbNXfos3/E---3.1_12418.p',p2_7) ).
cnf(p25_11,negated_conjecture,
p25(c33,c36),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A3kbNXfos3/E---3.1_12418.p',p25_11) ).
cnf(p25_12,negated_conjecture,
p25(c32,c33),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A3kbNXfos3/E---3.1_12418.p',p25_12) ).
cnf(p2_39,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A3kbNXfos3/E---3.1_12418.p',p2_39) ).
cnf(not_p2_19,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A3kbNXfos3/E---3.1_12418.p',not_p2_19) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))
| ~ p25(X1,c36)
| ~ p25(c32,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34))
| ~ p25(X1,c36)
| ~ p25(c32,X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p25(c33,c36),
p25_11 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p25(c32,c33),
p25_12 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
p2_39 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c33),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p2_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f18(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
| ~ p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c33),c34)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN684-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 11:01:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.A3kbNXfos3/E---3.1_12418.p
% 0.20/0.51 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 12497 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 12503 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 55
% 0.20/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses : 55
% 0.20/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 55
% 0.20/0.51 # Processed clauses : 215
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 15
% 0.20/0.51 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.20/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 199
% 0.20/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Generated clauses : 578
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 511
% 0.20/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Paramodulations : 578
% 0.20/0.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 75
% 0.20/0.51 # ...of those cached : 10
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 144
% 0.20/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 68
% 0.20/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 74
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 406
% 0.20/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 768
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 55
% 0.20/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1433
% 0.20/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1251
% 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.20/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.20/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 27
% 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10367
% 0.20/0.51 # Search garbage collected termcells : 155
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.20/0.51
% 0.20/0.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.082 s
% 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.092 s
% 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.20/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------