TSTP Solution File: SYN681-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN681-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:19:18 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9347/SYN/SYN681-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5289] [nf = 0] [nu = 5200] [ut = 3926]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1427878] [nf = 60] [nu = 1227180] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 102298815] [nf = 542] [nu = 101551437] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 103761474] [nf = 602] [nu = 102813487] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 255017289
% resolvents: 255016248 factors: 1041
% Number of unit clauses generated: 253556478
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.43
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 24 [1] = 3902 [2] = 28074
% Total = 32000
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 253556478 [2] = 1459151 [3] = 1652 [4] = 8
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p22_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] p10_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [2] p12_2 (+)2668 (-)0
% [3] p14_2 (+)5 (-)0
% [4] p19_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] p20_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [6] p24_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] p25_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [8] p26_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [9] p27_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [10] p2_2 (+)27642 (-)2
% [11] p3_2 (+)1664 (-)1
% [12] p6_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [13] p7_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [14] p23_3 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)31997 (-)3
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 19498227
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 255017289
% Number of unification failures: 15133417
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 56948
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 11125630
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1871297
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 984680
% Max entries in substitution set: 8
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 19570
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 15202
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 251692880
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 44
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 12
% Number of states in UCFA table: 473891
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 861518
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.90
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.55
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 70
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 270150706
% ConstructUnitClause() = 51546
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.14 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 850058
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------