TSTP Solution File: SYN673-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN673-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:13:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 42.54s 5.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 42.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SYN673-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:21:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 55 Number of unprocessed: 55
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36 # 55 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 55 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are 55 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 19 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.36 # 55 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36 # 36 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # 19 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 42.54/5.70 # There were 10 total branch saturation attempts.
% 42.54/5.70 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 42.54/5.70 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 42.54/5.70 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 42.54/5.70 # There were 3 total successful branch saturations.
% 42.54/5.70 # There were 1 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 42.54/5.70 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 42.54/5.70 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 42.54/5.70 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 42.54/5.70 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 42.54/5.70 # Begin clausification derivation
% 42.54/5.70
% 42.54/5.70 # End clausification derivation
% 42.54/5.70 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (p10(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (p27(f12(c32,c37),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30))))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_96, negated_conjecture, (p10(c38,f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),f17(c36,c40))))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (p9(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (p7(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (p6(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (p4(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (p25(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_63, negated_conjecture, (p23(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (p20(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_65, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_66, negated_conjecture, (p18(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_67, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_68, negated_conjecture, (p15(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_69, negated_conjecture, (p13(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_70, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_71, negated_conjecture, (p10(f14(f19(c35,X1),c41),X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_72, negated_conjecture, (~p29(f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)),c38))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_75, negated_conjecture, (p28(f21(c30,X1),c31)|~p16(X1,c40))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_92, negated_conjecture, (p28(f21(c30,X1),c31)|~p29(f24(c42,X1),c39))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_73, negated_conjecture, (p29(X1,X2)|~p27(f12(c32,X2),X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (p10(X1,X2)|~p10(X3,X2)|~p10(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_108, negated_conjecture, (p29(f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)),X1)|~p28(f21(c30,f26(c43,X1)),c31)|~p10(X1,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_109, negated_conjecture, (p27(f12(c32,f14(f19(c35,X1),f17(c36,c31))),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)))|~p29(f22(f8(c34,c30),X1),c37))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (p27(f12(c32,X1),X2)|~p29(X2,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_107, negated_conjecture, (p29(f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)),X1)|p29(f24(c42,f26(c43,X1)),c39)|~p10(X1,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (p9(X1,X2)|~p9(X3,X2)|~p9(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_79, negated_conjecture, (p7(X1,X2)|~p7(X3,X2)|~p7(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_80, negated_conjecture, (p6(X1,X2)|~p6(X3,X2)|~p6(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_81, negated_conjecture, (p4(X1,X2)|~p4(X3,X2)|~p4(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_82, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1,X2)|~p3(X3,X2)|~p3(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_83, negated_conjecture, (p25(X1,X2)|~p25(X3,X2)|~p25(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_84, negated_conjecture, (p23(X1,X2)|~p23(X3,X2)|~p23(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_110, negated_conjecture, (p27(f12(c32,f14(f19(c35,X1),f17(c36,X2))),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)))|~p28(f21(c30,X2),c31)|~p27(f12(c32,X1),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30))))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_85, negated_conjecture, (p20(X1,X2)|~p20(X3,X2)|~p20(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_86, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_87, negated_conjecture, (p18(X1,X2)|~p18(X3,X2)|~p18(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_88, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1,X2)|~p16(X3,X2)|~p16(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_89, negated_conjecture, (p15(X1,X2)|~p15(X3,X2)|~p15(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_90, negated_conjecture, (p13(X1,X2)|~p13(X3,X2)|~p13(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_91, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X2)|~p11(X3,X2)|~p11(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_93, negated_conjecture, (p29(X1,X2)|~p29(X3,X4)|~p4(X3,X1)|~p10(X4,X2))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_94, negated_conjecture, (p27(X1,X2)|~p27(X3,X4)|~p11(X3,X1)|~p4(X4,X2))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_98, negated_conjecture, (p10(f14(X1,X2),f14(X3,X4))|~p13(X1,X3)|~p10(X2,X4))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_99, negated_conjecture, (p10(f17(X1,X2),f17(X3,X4))|~p15(X1,X3)|~p16(X2,X4))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_97, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4))|~p2(X1,X3)|~p3(X2,X4))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_106, negated_conjecture, (p4(f24(X1,X2),f24(X3,X4))|~p16(X2,X4)|~p23(X1,X3))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_105, negated_conjecture, (p4(f22(X1,X2),f22(X3,X4))|~p3(X1,X3)|~p10(X2,X4))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_95, negated_conjecture, (p28(X1,X2)|~p28(X3,X4)|~p16(X4,X2)|~p20(X3,X1))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_104, negated_conjecture, (p3(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))|~p6(X1,X3)|~p7(X2,X4))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_103, negated_conjecture, (p20(f21(X1,X2),f21(X3,X4))|~p16(X2,X4)|~p7(X1,X3))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_102, negated_conjecture, (p16(f26(X1,X2),f26(X3,X4))|~p25(X1,X3)|~p10(X2,X4))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_101, negated_conjecture, (p13(f19(X1,X2),f19(X3,X4))|~p18(X1,X3)|~p10(X2,X4))).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_100, negated_conjecture, (p11(f12(X1,X2),f12(X3,X4))|~p9(X1,X3)|~p10(X2,X4))).
% 42.54/5.70 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 42.54/5.70 # Begin printing tableau
% 42.54/5.70 # Found 14 steps
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (p27(f12(c32,f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),c41)),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)))|~p29(f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)),f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),c41))), inference(start_rule)).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_201, plain, (p27(f12(c32,f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),c41)),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_94])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469653, plain, (~p4(f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_60])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469650, plain, (p27(f12(c32,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_110])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469722, plain, (p27(f12(c32,f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),f17(c36,c40))),f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_73])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469723, plain, (~p28(f21(c30,c40),c31)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_75])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469864, plain, (~p16(c40,c40)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_67])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469652, plain, (~p11(f12(c32,f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),c41)),f12(c32,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_100])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469893, plain, (~p9(c32,c32)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_57])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469894, plain, (~p10(f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),c41),f14(f19(c35,c37),c39))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_71])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_202, plain, (~p29(f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)),f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),c41))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_107])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469939, plain, (~p10(f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),c41),f14(f19(c35,c37),c39))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_71])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469793, plain, (p29(f5(c33,f8(c34,c30)),f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),f17(c36,c40)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_469793, ...])).
% 42.54/5.70 cnf(i_0_469938, plain, (p29(f24(c42,f26(c43,f14(f19(c35,f14(f19(c35,c37),c39)),c41))),c39)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_469938, ...])).
% 42.54/5.70 # End printing tableau
% 42.54/5.70 # SZS output end
% 42.54/5.70 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 42.54/5.71 # Child (26994) has found a proof.
% 42.54/5.71
% 42.54/5.71 # Proof search is over...
% 42.54/5.71 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------