TSTP Solution File: SYN670-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SYN670-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:32:01 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.81s 1.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_7) ).

cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
    p25(c32,c33),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p25_11) ).

cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    p25(c33,c36),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p25_12) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(X0,f18(X0,f9(f17(c31)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_18) ).

cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X0,X1)
    | ~ p2(X0,X2)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_30) ).

cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_38) ).

cnf(c_98,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p25(X0,c36)
    | ~ p25(c32,X0)
    | p2(f11(f4(X0),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_50) ).

cnf(c_454,plain,
    f4(c32) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_455,plain,
    f11(sP0_iProver_def,c34) = sP1_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_464,plain,
    f4(c33) = sP10_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_465,plain,
    f11(sP10_iProver_def,c34) = sP11_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_466,plain,
    f18(sP11_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def) = sP12_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_467,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p25(X0,c36)
    | ~ p25(c32,X0)
    | p2(f11(f4(X0),c34),sP1_iProver_def) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_454,c_455]) ).

cnf(c_474,negated_conjecture,
    p2(sP1_iProver_def,sP12_iProver_def),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_464,c_465,c_466]) ).

cnf(c_476,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X0,X1)
    | ~ p2(X0,X2)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).

cnf(c_483,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(X0,f18(X0,sP3_iProver_def)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

cnf(c_485,negated_conjecture,
    p25(c33,c36),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).

cnf(c_486,negated_conjecture,
    p25(c32,c33),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59]) ).

cnf(c_487,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).

cnf(c_890,plain,
    ( ~ p25(c32,c33)
    | ~ p25(c33,c36)
    | p2(f11(sP10_iProver_def,c34),sP1_iProver_def) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_464,c_467]) ).

cnf(c_891,plain,
    ( ~ p25(c32,c33)
    | ~ p25(c33,c36)
    | p2(sP11_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_890,c_465]) ).

cnf(c_892,plain,
    p2(sP11_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_891,c_485,c_486]) ).

cnf(c_970,plain,
    ( ~ p2(sP11_iProver_def,X0)
    | p2(sP1_iProver_def,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_892,c_476]) ).

cnf(c_1039,plain,
    ~ p2(sP11_iProver_def,sP12_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_466,c_483]) ).

cnf(c_1326,plain,
    p2(sP1_iProver_def,sP11_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_487,c_970]) ).

cnf(c_1329,plain,
    ( ~ p2(sP1_iProver_def,X0)
    | p2(sP11_iProver_def,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1326,c_476]) ).

cnf(c_1416,plain,
    p2(sP11_iProver_def,sP12_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_474,c_1329]) ).

cnf(c_1418,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1416,c_1039]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SYN670-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:15:03 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.81/1.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.81/1.18  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------  iProver source info
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.81/1.18  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.81/1.18  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 31 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  clauses                                 36
% 2.81/1.18  conjectures                             23
% 2.81/1.18  EPR                                     13
% 2.81/1.18  Horn                                    36
% 2.81/1.18  unary                                   23
% 2.81/1.18  binary                                  4
% 2.81/1.18  lits                                    59
% 2.81/1.18  lits eq                                 13
% 2.81/1.18  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.81/1.18  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.81/1.18  fd_cond                                 0
% 2.81/1.18  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 2.81/1.18  AC symbols                              0
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------ 
% 2.81/1.18  Current options:
% 2.81/1.18  ------ 
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.81/1.18  
% 2.81/1.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------