%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN670-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:14:09 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8945/SYN/SYN670-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 3754] [nf = 0] [nu = 3677] [ut = 2769]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 1325272] [nf = 60] [nu = 1119445] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 99962367] [nf = 470] [nu = 99301970] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 125 secs [nr = 101341022] [nf = 530] [nu = 100474875] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 248949874
% 	resolvents: 248948977	factors: 897
% Number of unit clauses generated: 247667273
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.48
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 23	[1] = 2746	[2] = 29231	
% Total = 32000
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 247667273	[2] = 1281203	[3] = 1390	[4] = 8	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p22_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [1] p10_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [2] p12_2		(+)1674	(-)0
% [3] p14_2		(+)5	(-)0
% [4] p19_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [5] p20_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [6] p24_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] p25_2		(+)3	(-)0
% [8] p26_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [9] p27_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [10] p2_2		(+)29133	(-)2
% [11] p3_2		(+)1168	(-)1
% [12] p6_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [13] p7_2		(+)3	(-)0
% [14] p23_3		(+)1	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)31997	(-)3
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 15665064
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 248949874
% Number of unification failures: 14250027
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 59434
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 8960308
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1500371
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 1100376
% Max entries in substitution set: 8
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 18762
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 15889
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 246012770
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 44
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 12
% Number of states in UCFA table: 495446
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 901980
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.94
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.55
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 70
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 263199901
% ConstructUnitClause() = 50739
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.20 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 829833
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------