TSTP Solution File: SYN649-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN649-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:00:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 49 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 17 ( 17 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p23_44,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,X1),X2),X3),f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,X1),X3),X2),X4))
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X1)),X2),X3),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23_44) ).
cnf(p23_40,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(X1,f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,X2),X3),X1),X4)),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X2)),X1),X3),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23_40) ).
cnf(p23_39,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(c24,X1),f14(f22(c33,X2),X1))
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23_39) ).
cnf(p23_26,negated_conjecture,
p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,f12(c27,c28))),c24),c25),c29),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23_26) ).
cnf(p23_42,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X1)),X2),X3),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(X2,X5),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,X1),X2),X3),X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23_42) ).
cnf(p23_41,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,c28),c24),f14(f22(c33,X1),X2)),X1)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23_41) ).
cnf(not_p23_38,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p23(f5(c24,c25),X1)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X1),c29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p23_38) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,X1),X2),X3),f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,X1),X3),X2),X4))
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X1)),X2),X3),X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p23_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(X1,f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,X2),X3),X1),X4)),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X2)),X1),X3),X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p23_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(c24,X1),f14(f22(c33,X2),X1))
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X1),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p23_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,X1),X2),X3),f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,X1),X3),X2),X4))
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X1)),X2),X3),X4) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,f12(c27,c28))),c24),c25),c29),
p23_26 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X1)),X2),X3),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(X2,X5),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,X1),X2),X3),X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p23_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(X1,f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,X2),X3),X1),X4)),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X2)),X1),X3),X4) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,c28),c24),f14(f22(c33,X1),X2)),X1)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X2),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p23_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p23(f5(c24,c25),X1)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X1),c29) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p23_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(c24,X1),f14(f22(c33,X2),X1))
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X1),X2) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),c25),f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,f12(c27,c28)),c25),c24),c29)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X1)),X2),X3),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(X2,X5),X4)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,X1),X2),X3),X5) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p23(f5(c24,f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,f12(c27,c28)),c25),c24),c29)),c29),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,c28),c24),f14(f22(c33,X1),X2)),X1)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X2),X1) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p23(f5(c24,c25),X1)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),X1),c29) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
p23(f5(c24,c25),f14(f22(c33,f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,f12(c27,c28)),c25),c24),c29)),c25)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,X1)),c24),X2),c29)
| ~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,X1),c24),X2),f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,f12(c27,c28)),c25),c24),c29)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,c28),c24),f14(f22(c33,f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,f12(c27,c28)),c25),c24),c29)),c25)),f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,f12(c27,c28)),c25),c24),c29)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ p23(f5(f7(f10(c26,f12(c27,c28)),c24),f14(f22(c33,f14(f16(f18(f20(c30,f12(c27,c28)),c25),c24),c29)),c25)),c29),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN649-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 14:36:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 31931 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FHHNM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 31936 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FHHNM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 44
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 44
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 121
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 121
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 68
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 42
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 68
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 23
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 77
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 56
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 16
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 44
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 636
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 583
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3336
% 0.20/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 154
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.045 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------