TSTP Solution File: SYN648-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN648-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.60s 1.81s
% Output   : Refutation 1.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SYN648-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 06:45:55 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.36  Tue Jul 12 06:45:55 2022
% 0.15/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 31670.
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.15/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.15/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.36  45 back subsumes 30.
% 0.15/0.36  46 back subsumes 31.
% 0.15/0.36  47 back subsumes 32.
% 0.15/0.36  48 back subsumes 33.
% 0.15/0.36  49 back subsumes 34.
% 0.15/0.36  50 back subsumes 35.
% 0.15/0.36  51 back subsumes 36.
% 0.15/0.36  52 back subsumes 37.
% 0.15/0.36  53 back subsumes 38.
% 0.15/0.36  54 back subsumes 39.
% 0.15/0.36  55 back subsumes 40.
% 0.15/0.36  56 back subsumes 41.
% 0.15/0.36  57 back subsumes 42.
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.60/1.79  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.60/1.79  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.60/1.79  number of clauses in intial UL: 31
% 1.60/1.79  number of clauses initially in problem: 46
% 1.60/1.79  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 67
% 1.60/1.79  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 1.60/1.79  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.60/1.79  absolute distinct symbol count: 33
% 1.60/1.79     distinct predicate count: 15
% 1.60/1.79     distinct function count: 10
% 1.60/1.79     distinct constant count: 8
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  
% 1.60/1.79  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.60/1.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.60/1.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.43 sec ----> 1464 [binary,1463.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.60/1.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.60/1.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  1 [] {+} -p24(f4(c27,c28),c29).
% 1.60/1.81  15 [] {+} p24(f4(c30,A),B)| -p24(f4(f6(c32,c30),A),B).
% 1.60/1.81  28 [] {+} p24(A,c29)| -p3(A,B)| -p2(C,D)| -p26(c31,D)| -p3(B,f4(C,c28))| -p24(f4(D,f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,A),B),C),D)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,A),B),C),D)).
% 1.60/1.81  29 [] {+} p24(A,c29)|p24(f4(f6(c32,B),f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,A),C),D),B)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,A),C),D),B))| -p3(A,C)| -p2(D,B)| -p26(c31,B)| -p3(C,f4(D,c28)).
% 1.60/1.81  43 [factor,28.2.5] {+} p24(f4(A,c28),c29)| -p3(f4(A,c28),f4(A,c28))| -p2(A,B)| -p26(c31,B)| -p24(f4(B,f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,f4(A,c28)),f4(A,c28)),A),B)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,f4(A,c28)),f4(A,c28)),A),B)).
% 1.60/1.81  44 [factor,29.3.6] {+} p24(f4(A,c28),c29)|p24(f4(f6(c32,B),f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,f4(A,c28)),f4(A,c28)),A),B)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,f4(A,c28)),f4(A,c28)),A),B))| -p3(f4(A,c28),f4(A,c28))| -p2(A,B)| -p26(c31,B).
% 1.60/1.81  49 [] {-} p3(A,A).
% 1.60/1.81  58 [] {-} p2(c27,c30).
% 1.60/1.81  59 [] {-} p26(c31,c30).
% 1.60/1.81  67 [hyper,59,44,49,58,unit_del,1] {-} p24(f4(f6(c32,c30),f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,f4(c27,c28)),f4(c27,c28)),c27),c30)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,f4(c27,c28)),f4(c27,c28)),c27),c30)).
% 1.60/1.81  132 [hyper,67,15] {-} p24(f4(c30,f17(f19(f21(f23(c33,f4(c27,c28)),f4(c27,c28)),c27),c30)),f9(f11(f13(f15(c34,f4(c27,c28)),f4(c27,c28)),c27),c30)).
% 1.60/1.81  1463 [hyper,132,43,49,58,59] {-} p24(f4(c27,c28),c29).
% 1.60/1.81  1464 [binary,1463.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.60/1.81  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  ============ end of search ============
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.60/1.81  
% 1.60/1.81  Process 31670 finished Tue Jul 12 06:45:56 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------