TSTP Solution File: SYN620-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN620-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.37s 1.60s
% Output : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN620-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:03:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Tue Jul 12 01:03:04 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 28481.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.19/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.19/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35 35 back subsumes 26.
% 0.19/0.35 36 back subsumes 27.
% 0.19/0.35 37 back subsumes 28.
% 0.19/0.35 38 back subsumes 29.
% 0.19/0.35 39 back subsumes 30.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.52 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.52 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.52 number of clauses in intial UL: 29
% 0.19/0.52 number of clauses initially in problem: 38
% 0.19/0.52 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 76
% 0.19/0.52 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.19/0.52 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.52 absolute distinct symbol count: 26
% 0.19/0.52 distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.19/0.52 distinct function count: 11
% 0.19/0.52 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.52
% 0.19/0.52 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Changing weight limit from 60 to 33.
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 205 givens.
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.10 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 210 givens.
% 0.91/1.10
% 0.91/1.13
% 0.91/1.13
% 0.91/1.13 Changing weight limit from 32 to 30.
% 0.91/1.13
% 0.91/1.13 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 215 givens.
% 0.91/1.13
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Changing weight limit from 30 to 28.
% 0.91/1.16
% 0.91/1.16 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 220 givens.
% 0.91/1.16
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Changing weight limit from 28 to 25.
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.02/1.22 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 225 givens.
% 1.02/1.22
% 1.19/1.37
% 1.19/1.37
% 1.19/1.37 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 1.19/1.37
% 1.19/1.37 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 310 givens.
% 1.19/1.37
% 1.19/1.41
% 1.19/1.41
% 1.19/1.41 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 1.19/1.41
% 1.19/1.41 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 345 givens.
% 1.19/1.41
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.37/1.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.37/1.60 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.20 sec ----> 6793 [binary,6792.1,24.1] {+} $F.
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.37/1.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.37/1.60 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 11 [] {+} p11(f12(A),f12(B))| -p10(A,B).
% 1.37/1.60 12 [] {+} p10(A,B)| -p10(C,A)| -p10(C,B).
% 1.37/1.60 20 [] {+} p20(A,B)| -p11(C,B)| -p20(D,C)| -p11(D,A).
% 1.37/1.60 24 [] {+} -p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c22),c27))).
% 1.37/1.60 35 [] {-} p10(A,A).
% 1.37/1.60 39 [] {+} p11(A,A).
% 1.37/1.60 42 [] {+} p10(f13(f6(c22),A),f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,A))).
% 1.37/1.60 43 [] {-} p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c24),A))).
% 1.37/1.60 72 [hyper,42,12,35] {+} p10(f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,A)),f13(f6(c22),A)).
% 1.37/1.60 73 [hyper,42,11] {+} p11(f12(f13(f6(c22),A)),f12(f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,A)))).
% 1.37/1.60 723 [hyper,72,11] {+} p11(f12(f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,A))),f12(f13(f6(c22),A))).
% 1.37/1.60 779 [hyper,73,20,39,43] {-} p20(f12(f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,f14(f15(f7(c25)))))),f12(f13(f6(c24),A))).
% 1.37/1.60 6792 [hyper,723,20,723,779] {-} p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c22),A))).
% 1.37/1.60 6793 [binary,6792.1,24.1] {+} $F.
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.37/1.60 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 ============ end of search ============
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 true clauses given 489 (93.1%)
% 1.37/1.60 false clauses given 36
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 FALSE TRUE
% 1.37/1.60 14 0 844
% 1.37/1.60 15 0 4
% 1.37/1.60 16 0 341
% 1.37/1.60 17 0 6
% 1.37/1.60 18 0 39
% 1.37/1.60 19 0 113
% 1.37/1.60 20 0 39
% 1.37/1.60 21 0 598
% 1.37/1.60 22 0 72
% 1.37/1.60 23 0 444
% 1.37/1.60 tot: 0 2500 (100.0% true)
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.37/1.60
% 1.37/1.60 Process 28481 finished Tue Jul 12 01:03:05 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------