%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Gandalf---c-2.6
% Problem  : SYN605-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality:r
% Format   : otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)
% Command  : gandalf-wrapper -time %d %s

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 unknown
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1000MB
% OS       : Linux 2.4.22-21mdk-i686-up-4GB
% CPULimit : 600s

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.0s
% Output   : Assurance 0.0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 
% Gandalf c-2.6 r1 starting to prove: /home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN605-1+noeq.in
% Using automatic strategy selection.
% Time limit in seconds: 600
% 
% prove-all-passes started
% 
% detected problem class: nne
% detected subclass: medium
% 
% strategies selected: 
% (hyper 27 #f 7 7)
% (binary-unit 10 #f 7 7)
% (binary-double 16 #f 7 7)
% (binary 54 #t 7 7)
% (binary-order 27 #f 7 7)
% (binary-posweight-order 125 #f)
% (binary-order-sos 54 #t)
% (binary-unit-uniteq 27 #f)
% (binary-weightorder 54 #f)
% (binary-order 54 #f)
% (hyper-order 43 #f)
% (binary 109 #t)
% 
% 
% ********* EMPTY CLAUSE DERIVED *********
% 
% 
% timer checkpoints: c(30,40,0,60,0,0)
% 
% 
% START OF PROOF
% 35 [] p3(f10(X,Y),f10(Z,U)) | -p3(X,Z) | -p3(Y,U).
% 37 [] p17(f9(f10(f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19),c22)),f6(f7(f8(c20)))).
% 40 [] -p17(X,Y) | -p2(Y,U) | -p2(X,Z) | p17(Z,U).
% 41 [] -p3(X,Z) | -p3(X,Y) | p3(Z,Y).
% 48 [] p2(f9(X),f9(Y)) | -p3(X,Y).
% 53 [] p3(f12(c22,c21),c22).
% 54 [] p3(X,X).
% 56 [] p2(X,X).
% 60 [] -p17(f9(f10(f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19),f12(X,c21))),f6(f7(f8(c20)))).
% 94 [hyper:41,53,54] p3(c22,f12(c22,c21)).
% 112 [hyper:35,94,54] p3(f10(X,c22),f10(X,f12(c22,c21))).
% 1858 [hyper:48,112] p2(f9(f10(X,c22)),f9(f10(X,f12(c22,c21)))).
% 28177 [hyper:40,1858,37,56,cut:60] contradiction
% END OF PROOF
% 
% Proof found by the following strategy:
% 
% using hyperresolution
% not using sos strategy
% using positive unit paramodulation strategy
% using dynamic demodulation
% using ordered paramodulation
% using kb ordering for equality
% preferring bigger arities for lex ordering
% clause length limited to 7
% clause depth limited to 7
% seconds given: 27
% 
% 
% ***GANDALF_FOUND_A_REFUTATION***
% 
% Global statistics over all passes: 
% 
%  given clauses:    139
%  derived clauses:   57596
%  kept clauses:      26261
%  kept size sum:     550519
%  kept mid-nuclei:   1837
%  kept new demods:   0
%  forw unit-subs:    28413
%  forw double-subs: 0
%  forw overdouble-subs: 0
%  backward subs:     0
%  fast unit cutoff:  1
%  full unit cutoff:  0
%  dbl  unit cutoff:  0
%  real runtime:  0.99
%  process. runtime:  0.99
% specific non-discr-tree subsumption statistics: 
%  tried:           37
%  length fails:    0
%  strength fails:  3
%  predlist fails:  34
%  aux str. fails:  0
%  by-lit fails:    0
%  full subs tried: 0
%  full subs fail:  0
% 
% ; program args: ("/home/graph/tptp/Systems/Gandalf---c-2.6/gandalf" "-time" "600" "/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/otter:hypothesis:set(auto),clear(print_given)---add_equality:r/SYN/SYN605-1+noeq.in")
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------