TSTP Solution File: SYN596-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN596-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:00:40 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 41 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p10_15,negated_conjecture,
( p10(X1,X2)
| ~ p10(X3,X1)
| ~ p10(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_15) ).
cnf(p18_23,negated_conjecture,
( p18(X1,X2)
| ~ p18(X3,X4)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p10(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_23) ).
cnf(p10_1,negated_conjecture,
p10(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_1) ).
cnf(p18_20,negated_conjecture,
p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_20) ).
cnf(p10_28,negated_conjecture,
p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24),f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_28) ).
cnf(not_p18_21,negated_conjecture,
~ p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p18_21) ).
cnf(p2_4,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p10(X1,X2)
| ~ p10(X3,X1)
| ~ p10(X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p10_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p18(X1,X2)
| ~ p18(X3,X4)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p10(X4,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p18_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p10(X1,X2)
| ~ p10(X3,X1)
| ~ p10(X3,X2) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p10(X1,X1),
p10_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p18(X1,X2)
| ~ p18(X3,X4)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p10(X4,X2) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
p18_20 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p10(X1,X2)
| ~ p10(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24),f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
p10_28 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p18_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p18(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(c20,X1)
| ~ p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24),f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( p18(X1,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24))
| ~ p2(c20,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_4 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SYN596-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 20 14:17:37 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.45 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # new_bool_3 with pid 9254 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.45 # Search class: FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 9259 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.45 # Search class: FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.45 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.45 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.45 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.45 # Parsed axioms : 28
% 0.17/0.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Initial clauses : 28
% 0.17/0.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 28
% 0.17/0.45 # Processed clauses : 146
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # ...subsumed : 33
% 0.17/0.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 113
% 0.17/0.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Generated clauses : 272
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 260
% 0.17/0.45 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Paramodulations : 272
% 0.17/0.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Total rewrite steps : 11
% 0.17/0.45 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 85
% 0.17/0.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.17/0.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.17/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 73
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 170
% 0.17/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 542
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 28
% 0.17/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1101
% 0.17/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1072
% 0.17/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 33
% 0.17/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.17/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4600
% 0.17/0.45 # Search garbage collected termcells : 78
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.45 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
% 0.17/0.45
% 0.17/0.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.45 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.45 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.17/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.17/0.45 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------