TSTP Solution File: SYN595-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN595-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.89s 2.11s
% Output : Refutation 1.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN595-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:23:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Tue Jul 12 04:23:19 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 6876.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 29 back subsumes 22.
% 0.12/0.36 30 back subsumes 21.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 26
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 33
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 21
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 10
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.87/1.07
% 0.87/1.07
% 0.87/1.07 Changing weight limit from 60 to 47.
% 0.87/1.07
% 0.87/1.07 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.87/1.07
% 0.87/1.07 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.87/1.07
% 0.87/1.07 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.87/1.07
% 0.87/1.07 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.87/1.07
% 0.87/1.07 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 60 givens.
% 0.87/1.07
% 1.00/1.23
% 1.00/1.23
% 1.00/1.23 Changing weight limit from 47 to 35.
% 1.00/1.23
% 1.00/1.23 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 70 givens.
% 1.00/1.23
% 1.19/1.38
% 1.19/1.38
% 1.19/1.38 Changing weight limit from 35 to 33.
% 1.19/1.38
% 1.19/1.38 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 80 givens.
% 1.19/1.38
% 1.38/1.60
% 1.38/1.60
% 1.38/1.60 Changing weight limit from 33 to 31.
% 1.38/1.60
% 1.38/1.60 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 95 givens.
% 1.38/1.60
% 1.51/1.70
% 1.51/1.70
% 1.51/1.70 Changing weight limit from 31 to 28.
% 1.51/1.70
% 1.51/1.70 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 100 givens.
% 1.51/1.70
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.64/1.82 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 110 givens.
% 1.64/1.82
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.89/2.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.89/2.11 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 1.71 sec ----> 16393 [hyper,80,19,29,32,30] {-} $F.
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.89/2.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.89/2.11 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 2 [] {+} p15(A,B)| -p14(A,B).
% 1.89/2.11 13 [] {+} p15(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(D,B)| -p15(C,D).
% 1.89/2.11 19 [] {+} -p2(A,f3(c17))| -p14(B,f3(f4(f5(c17))))| -p15(C,f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),c16))| -p7(f8(f10(f12(f11(f3(f5(c17)))),c18),f8(f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),f3(c17)),f9(f11(f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),f13(c16,f3(f5(c17))))),f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c22)))),f8(f10(f12(f11(f3(f5(c17)))),B),f8(f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),A),f9(f11(C),f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c22))))).
% 1.89/2.11 29 [] {+} p2(A,A).
% 1.89/2.11 30 [] {-} p7(A,A).
% 1.89/2.11 32 [] {-} p14(c18,f3(f4(f5(c17)))).
% 1.89/2.11 33 [] {-} p14(c19,f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),c16)).
% 1.89/2.11 34 [] {-} p2(c19,f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),f13(c16,f3(f5(c17))))).
% 1.89/2.11 64 [hyper,33,2] {-} p15(c19,f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),c16)).
% 1.89/2.11 80 [hyper,34,13,29,64] {+} p15(f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),f13(c16,f3(f5(c17)))),f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),c16)).
% 1.89/2.11 16393 [hyper,80,19,29,32,30] {-} $F.
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.89/2.11 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 ============ end of search ============
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 true clauses given 50 (36.8%)
% 1.89/2.11 false clauses given 86
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 FALSE TRUE
% 1.89/2.11 8 0 14
% 1.89/2.11 10 0 110
% 1.89/2.11 11 0 84
% 1.89/2.11 12 0 110
% 1.89/2.11 13 0 272
% 1.89/2.11 14 0 66
% 1.89/2.11 15 0 500
% 1.89/2.11 16 0 215
% 1.89/2.11 17 0 688
% 1.89/2.11 18 18 440
% 1.89/2.11 19 16 0
% 1.89/2.11 20 176 1
% 1.89/2.11 21 108 0
% 1.89/2.11 22 188 1
% 1.89/2.11 23 292 8
% 1.89/2.11 24 64 0
% 1.89/2.11 25 914 18
% 1.89/2.11 26 256 0
% 1.89/2.11 27 519 34
% 1.89/2.11 tot: 2551 2561 (50.1% true)
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.89/2.11
% 1.89/2.11 Process 6876 finished Tue Jul 12 04:23:21 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------