TSTP Solution File: SYN595-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SYN595-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:21:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SYN595-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:06:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/0.99 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/0.99 Process 30269 was started by sandbox2 on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/0.99 Tue Jul 12 04:06:23 2022
% 0.42/0.99 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_30116_n004.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_30116_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/0.99 set(auto2).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/0.99 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/0.99 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.99 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/0.99 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/0.99 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/0.99 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (27 formulas)
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.42/0.99 Function symbol KB weights: c17=1. c19=1. c16=1. c18=1. c21=1. c20=1. c22=1. f10=1. f6=1. f8=1. f13=1. f9=1. f3=1. f5=1. f4=1. f11=1. f12=1.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.42/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.42/0.99 % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.42/0.99 % Level of proof is 2.
% 0.42/0.99 % Maximum clause weight is 81.000.
% 0.42/0.99 % Given clauses 61.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 1 p2(A,A) # label(p2_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 2 p7(A,A) # label(p7_2) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 4 p14(c18,f3(f4(f5(c17)))) # label(p14_5) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 5 p14(c19,f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),c16)) # label(p14_8) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 6 p2(c19,f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),f13(c16,f3(f5(c17))))) # label(p2_17) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 10 -p2(A,f3(c17)) | -p14(B,f3(f4(f5(c17)))) | -p15(C,f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),c16)) | -p7(f8(f10(f12(f11(f3(f5(c17)))),c18),f8(f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),f3(c17)),f9(f11(f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),f13(c16,f3(f5(c17))))),f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c22)))),f8(f10(f12(f11(f3(f5(c17)))),B),f8(f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),A),f9(f11(C),f10(f11(f3(f4(f5(c17)))),c22))))) # label(not_p2_26) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 12 p15(A,B) | -p14(A,B) # label(p15_6) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 22 p15(A,B) | -p2(C,A) | -p2(D,B) | -p15(C,D) # label(p15_19) # label(negated_conjecture). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 40 -p15(f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),f13(c16,f3(f5(c17)))),f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),c16)). [ur(10,a,1,a,b,4,a,d,2,a)].
% 0.42/0.99 41 p15(c19,f6(f3(f4(f5(c17))),c16)). [resolve(12,b,5,a)].
% 0.42/0.99 212 $F. [ur(22,a,40,a,b,6,a,c,1,a),unit_del(a,41)].
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Given=61. Generated=328. Kept=211. proofs=1.
% 0.42/0.99 Usable=61. Sos=149. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=28. Hints=0.
% 0.42/0.99 Megabytes=0.33.
% 0.42/0.99 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.42/0.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Process 30269 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 12 04:06:23 2022
% 0.42/0.99 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------