TSTP Solution File: SYN585-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : SYN585-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:23:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.62s 0.84s
% Output : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN585-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 17:18:40 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.62/0.84
% 0.62/0.84 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.62/0.84 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.62/0.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.62/0.84 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.62/0.84 SPASS derived 1677 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1213 clauses.
% 0.62/0.84 SPASS allocated 64413 KBytes.
% 0.62/0.84 SPASS spent 0:00:00.47 on the problem.
% 0.62/0.84 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.62/0.84 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.62/0.84 0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.62/0.84 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.62/0.84 0:00:00.39 for the reduction.
% 0.62/0.84
% 0.62/0.84
% 0.62/0.84 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 11 :
% 0.62/0.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.62/0.84 2[0:Inp] || -> p11(u,u)*.
% 0.62/0.84 6[0:Inp] || p2(c12,f3(c13))* -> .
% 0.62/0.84 7[0:Inp] || -> p11(c18,f9(c12,c14))*r.
% 0.62/0.84 12[0:Inp] || p11(c18,f9(c12,f8(c16,c14)))*r -> .
% 0.62/0.84 13[0:Inp] || p11(u,v)*+ -> p11(u,f8(w,v))*.
% 0.62/0.84 16[0:Inp] || p11(u,v)* p11(v,w)* -> p11(u,w)*.
% 0.62/0.84 26[0:Inp] || p11(u,v)+ -> p2(w,f3(c13))* p11(f9(w,u),f9(w,v))*.
% 0.62/0.84 121[0:Res:2.0,13.0] || -> p11(u,f8(v,u))*r.
% 0.62/0.84 133[0:Res:121.0,26.0] || -> p2(u,f3(c13)) p11(f9(u,v),f9(u,f8(w,v)))*r.
% 0.62/0.84 1741[0:NCh:16.2,16.1,133.1,12.0] || p11(c18,f9(c12,c14)) -> p2(c12,f3(c13))*.
% 0.62/0.84 1743[0:MRR:1741.0,1741.1,7.0,6.0] || -> .
% 0.62/0.84 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.62/0.84 Formulae used in the proof : p11_2 not_p2_6 p11_7 not_p11_12 p11_13 p11_16 p2_26
% 0.62/0.84
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------