TSTP Solution File: SYN585-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN585-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:32:16 EST 2010

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25551/SYN/SYN585-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 173] [nf = 0] [nu = 101] [ut = 69]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% +================================================+
% |                                                |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% |                                                |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: p11_2(x0,x0)
% B3: p11_2(c18_0(),f9_2(c12_0(),c14_0()))
% B9: ~p2_2(c12_0(),f3_1(c13_0()))
% B12: ~p11_2(x0,x2) | p11_2(x0,f8_2(x1,x2))
% B20: ~p11_2(x2,x1) | ~p11_2(x0,x2) | p11_2(x0,x1)
% B25: ~p11_2(x1,x2) | p11_2(f9_2(x0,x1),f9_2(x0,x2)) | p2_2(x0,f3_1(c13_0()))
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U4: < d0 v0 dv0 f2 c4 t6 td3 b nc > ~p11_2(c18_0(),f9_2(c12_0(),f8_2(c16_0(),c14_0())))
% U12: < d1 v3 dv2 f1 c0 t4 td2 > p11_2(x0,f8_2(x1,x0))
% U71: < d2 v0 dv0 f3 c5 t8 td3 > ~p11_2(f9_2(c12_0(),c14_0()),f9_2(c12_0(),f8_2(c16_0(),c14_0())))
% U217: < d2 v3 dv2 f3 c2 t8 td3 > p11_2(f9_2(c12_0(),x0),f9_2(c12_0(),f8_2(x1,x0)))
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U4:
% ~p11_2(c18_0(),f9_2(c12_0(),f8_2(c16_0(),c14_0()))) ....... U4
% Derivation of unit clause U12:
% p11_2(x0,x0) ....... B0
% ~p11_2(x0,x2) | p11_2(x0,f8_2(x1,x2)) ....... B12
%  p11_2(x0, f8_2(x1, x0)) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B12:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U71:
% p11_2(c18_0(),f9_2(c12_0(),c14_0())) ....... B3
% ~p11_2(x2,x1) | ~p11_2(x0,x2) | p11_2(x0,x1) ....... B20
%  ~p11_2(f9_2(c12_0(), c14_0()), x0) | p11_2(c18_0(), x0) ....... R1 [B3:L0, B20:L1]
%  ~p11_2(c18_0(),f9_2(c12_0(),f8_2(c16_0(),c14_0()))) ....... U4
%   ~p11_2(f9_2(c12_0(), c14_0()), f9_2(c12_0(), f8_2(c16_0(), c14_0()))) ....... R2 [R1:L1, U4:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U217:
% ~p2_2(c12_0(),f3_1(c13_0())) ....... B9
% ~p11_2(x1,x2) | p11_2(f9_2(x0,x1),f9_2(x0,x2)) | p2_2(x0,f3_1(c13_0())) ....... B25
%  ~p11_2(x0, x1) | p11_2(f9_2(c12_0(), x0), f9_2(c12_0(), x1)) ....... R1 [B9:L0, B25:L2]
%  p11_2(x0,f8_2(x1,x0)) ....... U12
%   p11_2(f9_2(c12_0(), x0), f9_2(c12_0(), f8_2(x1, x0))) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U12:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% p11_2(f9_2(c12_0(),x0),f9_2(c12_0(),f8_2(x1,x0))) ....... U217
% ~p11_2(f9_2(c12_0(),c14_0()),f9_2(c12_0(),f8_2(c16_0(),c14_0()))) ....... U71
%  [] ....... R1 [U217:L0, U71:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 3632
% 	resolvents: 3630	factors: 2
% Number of unit clauses generated: 3338
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 91.91
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 12	[1] = 57	[2] = 149	
% Total = 218
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 3338	[2] = 277	[3] = 17	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p10_2		(+)2	(-)0
% [1] p11_2		(+)14	(-)7
% [2] p2_2		(+)190	(-)5
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)206	(-)12
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 218
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 500
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 3637
% Number of unification failures: 1365
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 1042
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 470
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 238
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 4
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3124
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 755
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 10
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 1088
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 1837
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 96000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.59
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 51
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 5002
% ConstructUnitClause() = 3330
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.02 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: inf
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 0 secs
% CPU time: 0.17 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------