TSTP Solution File: SYN575-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN575-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:46:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 38 ( 16 unt; 5 nHn; 29 RR)
% Number of literals : 94 ( 0 equ; 56 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p3_16,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p3(X3,X1)
| ~ p3(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_16) ).
cnf(p9_19,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,X2)
| ~ p7(X3,X1)
| ~ p9(X3,X4)
| ~ p3(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_19) ).
cnf(p9_10,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,f6(c14))
| ~ p9(X1,c13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_10) ).
cnf(p3_3,negated_conjecture,
p3(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_3) ).
cnf(p9_21,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f8(X1,X2),X1)
| p9(f8(X1,X2),f6(X2))
| ~ p11(X3,c15)
| ~ p9(c12,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,f5(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_21) ).
cnf(p3_8,negated_conjecture,
p3(f6(f5(X1)),f6(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_8) ).
cnf(p2_4,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).
cnf(p11_6,negated_conjecture,
p11(c14,c15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_6) ).
cnf(p9_5,negated_conjecture,
p9(c12,c13),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_5) ).
cnf(not_p11_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X1,c15)
| ~ p9(c12,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,f5(X1))
| ~ p9(f8(X2,X3),X2)
| ~ p9(f8(X2,X3),f6(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p11_22) ).
cnf(p7_2,negated_conjecture,
p7(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7_2) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p3(X3,X1)
| ~ p3(X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p3_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,X2)
| ~ p7(X3,X1)
| ~ p9(X3,X4)
| ~ p3(X4,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p9_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,f6(c14))
| ~ p9(X1,c13) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p9_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p3(X3,X1)
| ~ p3(X3,X2) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
p3(X1,X1),
p3_3 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f8(X1,X2),X1)
| p9(f8(X1,X2),f6(X2))
| ~ p11(X3,c15)
| ~ p9(c12,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,f5(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p9_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,X2)
| ~ p7(X3,X1)
| ~ p9(X3,X4)
| ~ p3(X4,X2) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,f6(c14))
| ~ p9(X1,c13) ),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,X2)
| ~ p3(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
p3(f6(f5(X1)),f6(X1)),
p3_8 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f8(X1,X2),X1)
| p9(f8(X1,X2),f6(X2))
| ~ p11(X3,c15)
| ~ p9(c12,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,f5(X3)) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_4 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,X2)
| ~ p9(X3,c13)
| ~ p3(f6(c14),X2)
| ~ p7(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
p3(f6(X1),f6(f5(X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f8(X1,f5(X2)),f6(f5(X2)))
| p9(f8(X1,f5(X2)),X1)
| ~ p11(X2,c15)
| ~ p9(c12,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
p11(c14,c15),
p11_6 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,f6(f5(c14)))
| ~ p9(X2,c13)
| ~ p7(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
p9(c12,c13),
p9_5 ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X1,c15)
| ~ p9(c12,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,f5(X1))
| ~ p9(f8(X2,X3),X2)
| ~ p9(f8(X2,X3),f6(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p11_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( p9(f8(X1,f5(c14)),f6(f5(c14)))
| p9(f8(X1,f5(c14)),X1)
| ~ p9(c12,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( p9(X1,f6(f5(c14)))
| ~ p7(c12,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
p7(X1,X1),
p7_2 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X1,c15)
| ~ p9(c12,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,f5(X1))
| ~ p9(f8(X2,X3),X2)
| ~ p9(f8(X2,X3),f6(X3)) ),
c_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
p9(f8(f6(f5(c14)),f5(c14)),f6(f5(c14))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X1,c15)
| ~ p9(c12,f6(f5(c14)))
| ~ p2(f5(c14),f5(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_34])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
~ p9(c12,f6(f5(c14))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_22]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN575-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 20 14:54:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.59 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 31118 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.59 # Search class: FGHNM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.59 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 31123 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.59 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.59 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.59 # Search class: FGHNM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.59 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.59 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.59 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.59
% 0.18/0.59 # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.59 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.59 # Parsed axioms : 22
% 0.18/0.59 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Initial clauses : 22
% 0.18/0.59 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.18/0.59 # Processed clauses : 1671
% 0.18/0.59 # ...of these trivial : 19
% 0.18/0.59 # ...subsumed : 1133
% 0.18/0.59 # ...remaining for further processing : 519
% 0.18/0.59 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.18/0.59 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Generated clauses : 7138
% 0.18/0.59 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6283
% 0.18/0.59 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Paramodulations : 7138
% 0.18/0.59 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Total rewrite steps : 886
% 0.18/0.59 # ...of those cached : 810
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.59 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.59 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.59 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.59 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.59 # Current number of processed clauses : 496
% 0.18/0.59 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 44
% 0.18/0.59 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.18/0.59 # Non-unit-clauses : 451
% 0.18/0.59 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4655
% 0.18/0.59 # ...number of literals in the above : 11611
% 0.18/0.59 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.18/0.59 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44252
% 0.18/0.59 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32508
% 0.18/0.59 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1133
% 0.18/0.59 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57
% 0.18/0.59 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # BW rewrite match attempts : 150
% 0.18/0.59 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.59 # Termbank termtop insertions : 98761
% 0.18/0.59 # Search garbage collected termcells : 75
% 0.18/0.59
% 0.18/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.59 # User time : 0.109 s
% 0.18/0.59 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.59 # Total time : 0.113 s
% 0.18/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.18/0.59
% 0.18/0.59 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.59 # User time : 0.554 s
% 0.18/0.59 # System time : 0.012 s
% 0.18/0.59 # Total time : 0.566 s
% 0.18/0.59 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.18/0.59 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------