TSTP Solution File: SYN573-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN573-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:31:37 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 1.11s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
p12(c15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c15_is_p12_1) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_3) ).
cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,X2)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_13) ).
cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p12(X0)
| p2(X0,f9(c17))
| p11(X0,c16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_14) ).
cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
p11(X0,f3(f8(X1),f3(f8(X0),f5(f6(f7(c14)))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_16) ).
cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,X3)
| ~ p11(X0,X2)
| p11(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_17) ).
cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
~ p11(c15,f3(f8(c16),f3(f8(f9(c17)),f5(f6(f7(c14)))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p11_19) ).
cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X0,X1)
| p11(X0,f3(f8(X1),f3(f8(X2),f5(f6(f7(c14)))))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_21) ).
cnf(c_257,plain,
f7(c14) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_258,plain,
f6(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_259,plain,
f5(sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_260,plain,
f8(c16) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_261,plain,
f9(c17) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_262,plain,
f8(sP4_iProver_def) = sP5_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_263,plain,
f3(sP5_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) = sP6_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_264,plain,
f3(sP3_iProver_def,sP6_iProver_def) = sP7_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_265,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X0,X1)
| p11(X0,f3(f8(X1),f3(f8(X2),sP2_iProver_def))) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_257,c_258,c_259]) ).
cnf(c_267,negated_conjecture,
~ p11(c15,sP7_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_261,c_262,c_263,c_260,c_264]) ).
cnf(c_268,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,X3)
| ~ p11(X0,X2)
| p11(X1,X3) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).
cnf(c_269,negated_conjecture,
p11(X0,f3(f8(X1),f3(f8(X0),sP2_iProver_def))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).
cnf(c_270,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p12(X0)
| p2(X0,sP4_iProver_def)
| p11(X0,c16) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).
cnf(c_271,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,X2)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).
cnf(c_281,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).
cnf(c_283,negated_conjecture,
p12(c15),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_665,plain,
p11(sP4_iProver_def,f3(f8(X0),f3(sP5_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_262,c_269]) ).
cnf(c_668,plain,
( ~ p11(X0,X1)
| p11(X0,f3(f8(X1),f3(sP5_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_262,c_265]) ).
cnf(c_669,plain,
p11(sP4_iProver_def,f3(f8(X0),sP6_iProver_def)),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_665,c_263]) ).
cnf(c_670,plain,
( ~ p11(X0,X1)
| p11(X0,f3(f8(X1),sP6_iProver_def)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_668,c_263]) ).
cnf(c_887,plain,
p11(sP4_iProver_def,f3(sP3_iProver_def,sP6_iProver_def)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_260,c_669]) ).
cnf(c_889,plain,
p11(sP4_iProver_def,sP7_iProver_def),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_887,c_264]) ).
cnf(c_1178,plain,
( ~ p11(X0,c16)
| p11(X0,f3(sP3_iProver_def,sP6_iProver_def)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_260,c_670]) ).
cnf(c_1182,plain,
( ~ p11(X0,c16)
| p11(X0,sP7_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1178,c_264]) ).
cnf(c_1320,plain,
( ~ p12(X0)
| p2(X0,sP4_iProver_def)
| p11(X0,sP7_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_270,c_1182]) ).
cnf(c_1335,plain,
( ~ p12(c15)
| p2(c15,sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1320,c_267]) ).
cnf(c_1336,plain,
p2(c15,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1335,c_283]) ).
cnf(c_1338,plain,
( ~ p2(c15,X0)
| p2(sP4_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1336,c_271]) ).
cnf(c_1384,plain,
p2(sP4_iProver_def,c15),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_1338]) ).
cnf(c_1388,plain,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p11(sP4_iProver_def,X0)
| p11(c15,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1384,c_268]) ).
cnf(c_2404,plain,
( ~ p11(sP4_iProver_def,X0)
| p11(c15,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_1388]) ).
cnf(c_2597,plain,
p11(c15,sP7_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_889,c_2404]) ).
cnf(c_2601,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2597,c_267]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SYN573-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:03:38 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.41/1.11 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/1.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------ iProver source info
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.41/1.11 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.41/1.11 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Proving...
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 clauses 27
% 0.41/1.11 conjectures 19
% 0.41/1.11 EPR 9
% 0.41/1.11 Horn 26
% 0.41/1.11 unary 13
% 0.41/1.11 binary 8
% 0.41/1.11 lits 48
% 0.41/1.11 lits eq 8
% 0.41/1.11 fd_pure 0
% 0.41/1.11 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.41/1.11 fd_cond 0
% 0.41/1.11 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.41/1.11 AC symbols 0
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------
% 0.41/1.11 Current options:
% 0.41/1.11 ------
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 ------ Proving...
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.41/1.11
% 0.41/1.11
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------