TSTP Solution File: SYN573-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN573-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 0.94s
% Output : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN573-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 02:20:12 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.37 Tue Jul 12 02:20:12 2022
% 0.14/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 14851.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.14/0.37 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.14/0.37 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.37 24 back subsumes 18.
% 0.14/0.37 25 back subsumes 19.
% 0.14/0.37
% 0.14/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.14/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 24
% 0.14/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 83
% 0.14/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.14/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.14/0.39 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.14/0.39 distinct function count: 7
% 0.14/0.39 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.69/0.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.69/0.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.55 sec ----> 223 [binary,222.1,15.1] {-} $F.
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 5.
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.69/0.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.69/0.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 10 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 0.69/0.94 11 [] {+} p11(A,c16)|p2(A,f9(c17))| -p12(A).
% 0.69/0.94 13 [] {+} p11(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(D,B)| -p11(C,D).
% 0.69/0.94 15 [] {+} -p11(c15,f3(f8(c16),f3(f8(f9(c17)),f5(f6(f7(c14)))))).
% 0.69/0.94 17 [] {+} p11(A,f3(f8(B),f3(f8(C),f5(f6(f7(c14))))))| -p11(A,B).
% 0.69/0.94 23 [] {+} p12(c15).
% 0.69/0.94 25 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 0.69/0.94 26 [] {-} p11(A,f3(f8(B),f3(f8(A),f5(f6(f7(c14)))))).
% 0.69/0.94 28 [hyper,23,11] {+} p11(c15,c16)|p2(c15,f9(c17)).
% 0.69/0.94 65 [hyper,28,10,25] {+} p11(c15,c16)|p2(f9(c17),c15).
% 0.69/0.94 216 [hyper,65,13,25,26] {-} p11(c15,c16)|p11(c15,f3(f8(A),f3(f8(f9(c17)),f5(f6(f7(c14)))))).
% 0.69/0.94 219 [hyper,216,17] {-} p11(c15,f3(f8(A),f3(f8(f9(c17)),f5(f6(f7(c14))))))|p11(c15,f3(f8(c16),f3(f8(B),f5(f6(f7(c14)))))).
% 0.69/0.94 222 [factor,219.1.2] {-} p11(c15,f3(f8(c16),f3(f8(f9(c17)),f5(f6(f7(c14)))))).
% 0.69/0.94 223 [binary,222.1,15.1] {-} $F.
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.69/0.94 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 ============ end of search ============
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 true clauses given 15 (39.5%)
% 0.69/0.94 false clauses given 23
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 FALSE TRUE
% 0.69/0.94 9 0 20
% 0.69/0.94 10 0 10
% 0.69/0.94 11 0 16
% 0.69/0.94 12 0 9
% 0.69/0.94 13 0 23
% 0.69/0.94 15 0 22
% 0.69/0.94 17 0 20
% 0.69/0.94 19 0 12
% 0.69/0.94 21 0 4
% 0.69/0.94 22 1 0
% 0.69/0.94 23 0 1
% 0.69/0.94 25 3 0
% 0.69/0.94 27 4 0
% 0.69/0.94 29 3 0
% 0.69/0.94 30 1 0
% 0.69/0.94 32 2 0
% 0.69/0.94 34 1 0
% 0.69/0.94 tot: 15 137 (90.1% true)
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.69/0.94
% 0.69/0.94 Process 14851 finished Tue Jul 12 02:20:13 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------