TSTP Solution File: SYN571-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN571-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:24:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.67s 1.90s
% Output   : Refutation 1.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ p11(A,f3(A,f5(f6(f7(c12))))),
    file('SYN571-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( p11(c14,A)
    | ~ p11(f5(f10(A)),A) ),
    file('SYN571-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( p2(A,B)
    | ~ p2(C,A)
    | ~ p2(C,B) ),
    file('SYN571-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( p11(A,f3(B,C))
    | ~ p11(f9(A,C),B) ),
    file('SYN571-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( p11(A,B)
    | ~ p2(C,A)
    | ~ p2(D,B)
    | ~ p11(C,D) ),
    file('SYN571-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    p2(A,A),
    file('SYN571-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    p11(f5(A),c14),
    file('SYN571-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    p2(f9(f5(A),f5(B)),f5(f8(A,B))),
    file('SYN571-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(48,plain,
    p2(f5(f8(A,B)),f9(f5(A),f5(B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[26,8,23]),
    [iquote('hyper,26,8,23')] ).

cnf(154,plain,
    p11(f9(f5(A),f5(B)),c14),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[48,12,23,24]),
    [iquote('hyper,48,12,23,24')] ).

cnf(220,plain,
    p11(f5(A),f3(c14,f5(B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[154,10]),
    [iquote('hyper,154,10')] ).

cnf(292,plain,
    p11(c14,f3(c14,f5(A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[220,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,220,3')] ).

cnf(293,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[292,2]),
    [iquote('binary,292.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SYN571-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:13:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.67/1.90  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.67/1.90  The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 1.67/1.90  Wed Jul 27 11:13:05 2022
% 1.67/1.90  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 12549.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.67/1.90  set(auto).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.67/1.90  clear(print_given).
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  list(usable).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p4(X26,X26).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p2(X11,X11).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p11(f5(X10),c14).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] -p11(c13,f5(X40)).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p11(X4,X5)|p11(X5,X4).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] -p11(X39,f3(X39,f5(f6(f7(c12))))).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p11(c14,X9)| -p11(f5(f10(X9)),X9).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p4(f7(X33),f7(X34))| -p4(X33,X34).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p2(f5(X18),f5(X19))| -p4(X18,X19).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p4(f10(X29),f10(X30))| -p2(X29,X30).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p4(f6(X31),f6(X32))| -p4(X31,X32).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p2(X12,X13)| -p2(X11,X12)| -p2(X11,X13).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p4(X27,X28)| -p4(X26,X27)| -p4(X26,X28).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p2(f9(f5(X24),f5(X25)),f5(f8(X24,X25))).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p11(X6,f3(X7,X8))| -p11(f9(X6,X8),X7).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p11(f9(X6,X8),X7)| -p11(X6,f3(X7,X8)).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p11(X0,X1)| -p2(X2,X0)| -p2(X3,X1)| -p11(X2,X3).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p4(f8(X35,X36),f8(X37,X38))| -p4(X35,X37)| -p4(X36,X38).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p2(f3(X14,X15),f3(X16,X17))| -p2(X14,X16)| -p2(X15,X17).
% 1.67/1.90  0 [] p2(f9(X20,X21),f9(X22,X23))| -p2(X20,X22)| -p2(X21,X23).
% 1.67/1.90  end_of_list.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.67/1.90  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.67/1.90  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.67/1.90     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  ------------> process usable:
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 1 [] -p11(c13,f5(A)).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] -p11(A,f3(A,f5(f6(f7(c12))))).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] p11(c14,A)| -p11(f5(f10(A)),A).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 4 [] p4(f7(A),f7(B))| -p4(A,B).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 5 [] p2(f5(A),f5(B))| -p4(A,B).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 6 [] p4(f10(A),f10(B))| -p2(A,B).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 7 [] p4(f6(A),f6(B))| -p4(A,B).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 8 [] p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 9 [] p4(A,B)| -p4(C,A)| -p4(C,B).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 10 [] p11(A,f3(B,C))| -p11(f9(A,C),B).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 11 [] p11(f9(A,B),C)| -p11(A,f3(C,B)).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 12 [] p11(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(D,B)| -p11(C,D).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 13 [] p4(f8(A,B),f8(C,D))| -p4(A,C)| -p4(B,D).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 14 [] p2(f3(A,B),f3(C,D))| -p2(A,C)| -p2(B,D).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 15 [] p2(f9(A,B),f9(C,D))| -p2(A,C)| -p2(B,D).
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  ------------> process sos:
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 22 [] p4(A,A).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 23 [] p2(A,A).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 24 [] p11(f5(A),c14).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 25 [] p11(A,B)|p11(B,A).
% 1.67/1.90  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 26 [] p2(f9(f5(A),f5(B)),f5(f8(A,B))).
% 1.67/1.90  22 back subsumes 17.
% 1.67/1.90  23 back subsumes 16.
% 1.67/1.90  25 back subsumes 18.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 293 [binary,292.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.67/1.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.67/1.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.67/1.90  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  ============ end of search ============
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.67/1.90  clauses given                 28
% 1.67/1.90  clauses generated            455
% 1.67/1.90  clauses kept                 292
% 1.67/1.90  clauses forward subsumed     183
% 1.67/1.90  clauses back subsumed         14
% 1.67/1.90  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.67/1.90  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.67/1.90  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.67/1.90  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.67/1.90  
% 1.67/1.90  Process 12549 finished Wed Jul 27 11:13:07 2022
% 1.67/1.90  Otter interrupted
% 1.67/1.90  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------