TSTP Solution File: SYN570-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN570-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:24:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.79s 1.98s
% Output   : Refutation 1.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   23 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ~ p9(f4(c12),f8(c13)),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( p3(f4(A),f4(B))
    | ~ p2(A,B) ),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( p3(A,B)
    | ~ p3(C,A)
    | ~ p3(C,B) ),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( p2(A,B)
    | ~ p2(C,A)
    | ~ p2(C,B) ),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( p9(A,B)
    | ~ p7(C,B)
    | ~ p9(D,C)
    | ~ p3(D,A) ),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    p7(A,A),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    p2(A,A),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    p9(c15,f8(c13)),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    p2(c12,f5(c15)),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    p3(f4(f5(A)),A),
    file('SYN570-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    p2(f5(c15),c12),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[19,9,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,19,9,16')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    p3(f4(f5(c15)),f4(c12)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[22,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,22,4')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    p3(c15,f4(c12)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[24,8,20]),
    [iquote('hyper,24,8,20')] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    p9(f4(c12),f8(c13)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[35,10,13,18]),
    [iquote('hyper,35,10,13,18')] ).

cnf(40,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[39,1]),
    [iquote('binary,39.1,1.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN570-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:20:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.79/1.98  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.79/1.98  The process was started by sandbox2 on n003.cluster.edu,
% 1.79/1.98  Wed Jul 27 11:20:56 2022
% 1.79/1.98  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 2915.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.79/1.98  set(auto).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.79/1.98  clear(print_given).
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  list(usable).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p10(X0,X0).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p7(X21,X21).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p6(X18,X18).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p3(X12,X12).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p2(X7,X7).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p11(c12,c14).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p9(c15,f8(c13)).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p2(c12,f5(c15)).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p3(f4(f5(X17)),X17).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] -p9(f4(c12),f8(c13)).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p7(f8(X24),f8(X25))| -p6(X24,X25).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p2(f5(X10),f5(X11))| -p3(X10,X11).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p3(f4(X15),f4(X16))| -p2(X15,X16).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p10(X1,X2)| -p10(X0,X1)| -p10(X0,X2).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p7(X22,X23)| -p7(X21,X22)| -p7(X21,X23).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p6(X19,X20)| -p6(X18,X19)| -p6(X18,X20).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p3(X13,X14)| -p3(X12,X13)| -p3(X12,X14).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p2(X8,X9)| -p2(X7,X8)| -p2(X7,X9).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p9(X26,X27)| -p7(X29,X27)| -p9(X28,X29)| -p3(X28,X26).
% 1.79/1.98  0 [] p11(X3,X4)| -p11(X6,X5)| -p2(X6,X3)| -p10(X5,X4).
% 1.79/1.98  end_of_list.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.79/1.98  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.79/1.98  in usable.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.79/1.98     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  ------------> process usable:
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 1 [] -p9(f4(c12),f8(c13)).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] p7(f8(A),f8(B))| -p6(A,B).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] p2(f5(A),f5(B))| -p3(A,B).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 4 [] p3(f4(A),f4(B))| -p2(A,B).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 5 [] p10(A,B)| -p10(C,A)| -p10(C,B).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] p7(A,B)| -p7(C,A)| -p7(C,B).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 7 [] p6(A,B)| -p6(C,A)| -p6(C,B).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 8 [] p3(A,B)| -p3(C,A)| -p3(C,B).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 9 [] p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 10 [] p9(A,B)| -p7(C,B)| -p9(D,C)| -p3(D,A).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 11 [] p11(A,B)| -p11(C,D)| -p2(C,A)| -p10(D,B).
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  ------------> process sos:
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 12 [] p10(A,A).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 13 [] p7(A,A).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 14 [] p6(A,A).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 15 [] p3(A,A).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 16 [] p2(A,A).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 17 [] p11(c12,c14).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 18 [] p9(c15,f8(c13)).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 19 [] p2(c12,f5(c15)).
% 1.79/1.98  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 20 [] p3(f4(f5(A)),A).
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 40 [binary,39.1,1.1] $F.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 4.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.79/1.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.79/1.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.79/1.98  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  ============ end of search ============
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.79/1.98  clauses given                 15
% 1.79/1.98  clauses generated             58
% 1.79/1.98  clauses kept                  39
% 1.79/1.98  clauses forward subsumed      39
% 1.79/1.98  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.79/1.98  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.79/1.98  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.79/1.98  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.79/1.98  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.79/1.98  
% 1.79/1.98  Process 2915 finished Wed Jul 27 11:20:58 2022
% 1.79/1.98  Otter interrupted
% 1.79/1.98  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------