TSTP Solution File: SYN568-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN568-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:00:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 12 unt; 5 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(not_p10_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p10(X1,X2)
| ~ p11(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p10_6) ).
cnf(p3_20,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,f6(c12))
| p10(f4(X2,X1),f4(X3,X1))
| ~ p10(X2,X3)
| ~ p11(f5(f6(c12)),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_20) ).
cnf(not_p3_7,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(f6(f7(f8(c12))),f6(c12)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p3_7) ).
cnf(p11_18,negated_conjecture,
p11(f4(f9(c13),f6(f7(f8(c12)))),f4(f9(c14),f6(f7(f8(c12))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_18) ).
cnf(p11_4,negated_conjecture,
p11(f5(f6(c12)),f9(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_4) ).
cnf(not_p11_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p11(f9(c13),f9(c14)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p11_3) ).
cnf(p10_5,negated_conjecture,
( p10(X1,X2)
| p11(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_5) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p10(X1,X2)
| ~ p11(X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p10_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,f6(c12))
| p10(f4(X2,X1),f4(X3,X1))
| ~ p10(X2,X3)
| ~ p11(f5(f6(c12)),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p3_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p10(X1,X2)
| ~ p11(X2,X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,f6(c12))
| p10(f4(X2,X1),f4(X3,X1))
| ~ p10(X2,X3)
| ~ p11(f5(f6(c12)),X2) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(f6(f7(f8(c12))),f6(c12)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p3_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p3(X1,f6(c12))
| ~ p10(X2,X3)
| ~ p11(f4(X3,X1),f4(X2,X1))
| ~ p11(f5(f6(c12)),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p11(f4(f9(c13),f6(f7(f8(c12)))),f4(f9(c14),f6(f7(f8(c12))))),
p11_18 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p11(f5(f6(c12)),f9(X1)),
p11_4 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p3(f6(f7(f8(c12))),f6(c12)),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ p11(f9(c13),f9(c14)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p11_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p10(f9(c14),f9(c13)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p10(X1,X2)
| p11(X2,X1) ),
p10_5 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ p11(f9(c13),f9(c14)),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN568-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:22:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_1 with pid 10231 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGHNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): FGHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 10237 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGHNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # partial match(1): FGHNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 20
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 46
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 46
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 34
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 30
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 34
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 77
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 20
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 107
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 90
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1121
% 0.21/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 56
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------