TSTP Solution File: SYN567-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN567-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:31:35 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.66s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.66s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
p5(f8(f6(X0)),X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p5_3) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f4(c10))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_4) ).
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f4(c10)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_5) ).
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f4(c10))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_6) ).
cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p5(X0,X1)
| p2(f6(X0),f6(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_10) ).
cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_12) ).
cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(f6(f8(X0)),X0)
| p2(X0,f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10))))))
| p2(X0,f3(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))
| p2(X0,f3(f7(f4(c10))))
| p2(X0,f3(f4(c10))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_19) ).
cnf(c_153,plain,
f4(c10) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_154,plain,
f7(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_155,plain,
f7(sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_156,plain,
f7(sP2_iProver_def) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_157,plain,
f3(sP3_iProver_def) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_158,plain,
f3(sP2_iProver_def) = sP5_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_159,plain,
f3(sP1_iProver_def) = sP6_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_160,plain,
f3(sP0_iProver_def) = sP7_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_161,plain,
f6(c9) = sP8_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_162,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(f6(f8(X0)),X0)
| p2(X0,sP4_iProver_def)
| p2(X0,sP5_iProver_def)
| p2(X0,sP6_iProver_def)
| p2(X0,sP7_iProver_def) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_160,c_159,c_158,c_153,c_154,c_155,c_156,c_157]) ).
cnf(c_169,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_161]) ).
cnf(c_171,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p5(X0,X1)
| p2(f6(X0),f6(X1)) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).
cnf(c_175,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).
cnf(c_176,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP6_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).
cnf(c_177,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP7_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).
cnf(c_178,negated_conjecture,
p5(f8(f6(X0)),X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).
cnf(c_517,plain,
( ~ p5(f8(f6(X0)),X0)
| p2(f6(X0),sP4_iProver_def)
| p2(f6(X0),sP5_iProver_def)
| p2(f6(X0),sP6_iProver_def)
| p2(f6(X0),sP7_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_171,c_162]) ).
cnf(c_518,plain,
( p2(f6(X0),sP4_iProver_def)
| p2(f6(X0),sP5_iProver_def)
| p2(f6(X0),sP6_iProver_def)
| p2(f6(X0),sP7_iProver_def) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_517,c_178]) ).
cnf(c_856,plain,
( p2(f6(c9),sP4_iProver_def)
| p2(f6(c9),sP5_iProver_def)
| p2(f6(c9),sP6_iProver_def)
| p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP7_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_161,c_518]) ).
cnf(c_859,plain,
( p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def)
| p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def)
| p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP6_iProver_def)
| p2(sP8_iProver_def,sP7_iProver_def) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_856,c_161]) ).
cnf(c_860,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_859,c_177,c_176,c_175,c_169]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN567-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu May 2 21:04:21 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.66/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.66/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.66/1.18 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.66/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 clauses 28
% 1.66/1.18 conjectures 19
% 1.66/1.18 EPR 8
% 1.66/1.18 Horn 27
% 1.66/1.18 unary 16
% 1.66/1.18 binary 9
% 1.66/1.18 lits 45
% 1.66/1.18 lits eq 9
% 1.66/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 1.66/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.66/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 1.66/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.66/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------
% 1.66/1.18 Current options:
% 1.66/1.18 ------
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.66/1.18
% 1.66/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------