TSTP Solution File: SYN560-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN560-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.81s 1.00s
% Output : Refutation 0.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN560-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 15:47:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Mon Jul 11 15:47:45 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3895.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 15 back subsumes 11.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.38/0.57 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.38/0.57 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.38/0.57 number of clauses in intial UL: 13
% 0.38/0.57 number of clauses initially in problem: 18
% 0.38/0.57 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 72
% 0.38/0.57 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 84
% 0.38/0.57 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.38/0.57 absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.38/0.57 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.38/0.57 distinct function count: 5
% 0.38/0.57 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.57
% 0.38/0.57 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.59/0.77
% 0.59/0.77
% 0.59/0.77 Changing weight limit from 60 to 32.
% 0.59/0.77
% 0.59/0.77 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 45 givens.
% 0.59/0.77
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.61 sec ----> 6974 [binary,6973.1,7.1] {+} $F.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 1 [] {+} -p2(c9,f3(c10)).
% 0.81/1.00 5 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 0.81/1.00 6 [] {+} p8(A,B)| -p8(A,C)| -p8(C,B).
% 0.81/1.00 7 [] {+} -p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f4(f5(c12,c14))))).
% 0.81/1.00 8 [] {+} p8(A,B)| -p2(C,B)| -p8(D,C)| -p2(D,A).
% 0.81/1.00 10 [] {+} p2(f6(A,B),f6(C,D))| -p2(B,D)| -p2(A,C).
% 0.81/1.00 15 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 0.81/1.00 17 [] {-} p2(f4(A),f5(A,f3(f7(c10)))).
% 0.81/1.00 18 [] {-} p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f5(c12,c14)))).
% 0.81/1.00 19 [] {-} p2(A,f3(c10))|p8(f6(A,B),f6(A,f5(B,f3(f7(c10))))).
% 0.81/1.00 28 [hyper,17,5,15] {-} p2(f5(A,f3(f7(c10))),f4(A)).
% 0.81/1.00 38 [hyper,28,10,15] {+} p2(f6(A,f5(B,f3(f7(c10)))),f6(A,f4(B))).
% 0.81/1.00 66 [hyper,19,6,18,unit_del,1] {-} p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f5(f4(f5(c12,c14)),f3(f7(c10))))).
% 0.81/1.00 6973 [hyper,38,8,66,15] {-} p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f4(f5(c12,c14))))).
% 0.81/1.00 6974 [binary,6973.1,7.1] {+} $F.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.81/1.00 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 ============ end of search ============
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 true clauses given 25 (37.9%)
% 0.81/1.00 false clauses given 41
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00 FALSE TRUE
% 0.81/1.00 10 0 25
% 0.81/1.00 11 0 6
% 0.81/1.00 12 0 45
% 0.81/1.00 13 0 27
% 0.81/1.00 14 0 45
% 0.81/1.00 15 6 105
% 0.81/1.00 16 18 59
% 0.81/1.00 17 11 215
% 0.81/1.00 18 18 123
% 0.81/1.00 19 12 309
% 0.81/1.00 20 1 256
% 0.81/1.00 21 12 440
% 0.81/1.00 22 6 474
% 0.81/1.00 23 24 499
% 0.81/1.00 24 24 36
% 0.81/1.00 25 27 36
% 0.81/1.00 26 38 12
% 0.81/1.00 27 52 0
% 0.81/1.00 28 53 20
% 0.81/1.00 29 56 0
% 0.81/1.00 30 39 0
% 0.81/1.00 31 10 0
% 0.81/1.00 32 5 0
% 0.81/1.00 tot: 412 2732 (86.9% true)
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.00
% 0.81/1.01 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.01
% 0.81/1.01 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.81/1.01
% 0.81/1.01 Process 3895 finished Mon Jul 11 15:47:46 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------