TSTP Solution File: SYN560-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN560-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:12:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SYN560-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 15:50:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 15 Number of unprocessed: 15
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36 # 15 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 15 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are 15 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.36 # 15 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36 # 9 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (p2(c11,f4(f5(c12,c13))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f5(c12,c14)))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (p2(f4(X1),f5(X1,f3(f7(c10)))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~p2(c9,f3(c10)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f4(f5(c12,c14))))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (p2(f3(X1),f3(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (p8(X1,X2)|~p8(X3,X2)|~p8(X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (p2(f4(X1),f4(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (p2(f7(X1),f7(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (p2(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (p8(f6(X1,X2),f6(X1,f5(X2,f3(f7(c10)))))|p2(X1,f3(c10)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (p2(f6(X1,X2),f6(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (p8(X1,X2)|~p8(X3,X4)|~p2(X3,X1)|~p2(X4,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38 # Found 7 steps
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (p2(c9,f3(c10))|~p2(f3(c10),f3(c10))|~p2(f3(c10),c9)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (p2(c9,f3(c10))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (~p2(f3(c10),f3(c10))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (~p2(f3(c10),c9)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (~p2(c9,c9)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (~p2(c9,f3(c10))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_90, plain, (p8(f6(c9,X4),f6(c9,f5(X4,f3(f7(c10)))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_90, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (p2(c11,f4(f5(c12,c13))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f5(c12,c14)))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (p2(f4(X1),f5(X1,f3(f7(c10)))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (~p2(c9,f3(c10)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (~p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f4(f5(c12,c14))))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (p2(f3(X1),f3(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (p8(X1,X2)|~p8(X3,X2)|~p8(X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (p2(f4(X1),f4(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (p2(f7(X1),f7(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (p2(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (p8(f6(X1,X2),f6(X1,f5(X2,f3(f7(c10)))))|p2(X1,f3(c10)))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (p2(f6(X1,X2),f6(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (p8(X1,X2)|~p8(X3,X4)|~p2(X3,X1)|~p2(X4,X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38 # Found 8 steps
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f4(f5(c12,c14)))))|~p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f5(c12,c14))))|~p2(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(c12)))|~p2(f6(c9,f4(f5(c12,c14))),f6(c9,f4(f4(f5(c12,c14)))))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f4(f5(c12,c14)))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~p8(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(f5(c12,c14))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_25])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~p2(f6(c9,f4(c12)),f6(c9,f4(c12)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~p2(f6(c9,f4(f5(c12,c14))),f6(c9,f4(f4(f5(c12,c14)))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (~p2(c9,c9)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (~p2(f4(f5(c12,c14)),f4(f4(f5(c12,c14))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (~p2(f5(c12,c14),f4(f5(c12,c14)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_80, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.38 # Child (28417) has found a proof.
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------