TSTP Solution File: SYN557-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SYN557-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:31:33 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.93s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_1) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(c6,f3(c8,f5(c9))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_3) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X0,X1),f3(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).

cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X0,X1)
    | ~ p2(X0,X2)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_6) ).

cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(f3(X0,X1),f3(X2,X1))
    | p2(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_8) ).

cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X0,f3(X1,X2)),f3(X1,f3(X0,X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_10) ).

cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(c6,f5(c7)),f3(c8,f3(f5(c7),f5(c9)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_12) ).

cnf(c_112,plain,
    f5(c7) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_113,plain,
    f3(c6,sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_114,plain,
    f5(c9) = sP2_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    f3(sP0_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) = sP3_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    f3(c8,sP3_iProver_def) = sP4_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_117,plain,
    f3(c8,sP2_iProver_def) = sP5_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_119,negated_conjecture,
    p2(sP1_iProver_def,sP4_iProver_def),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_114,c_115,c_116,c_112,c_113]) ).

cnf(c_121,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X0,f3(X1,X2)),f3(X1,f3(X0,X2))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

cnf(c_123,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(f3(X0,X1),f3(X2,X1))
    | p2(X0,X2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

cnf(c_125,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X0,X1)
    | ~ p2(X0,X2)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

cnf(c_127,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X0,X1),f3(X1,X0)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_128,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(c6,sP5_iProver_def),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_117]) ).

cnf(c_130,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_338,plain,
    p2(f3(sP0_iProver_def,f3(X0,sP2_iProver_def)),f3(X0,sP3_iProver_def)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_121]) ).

cnf(c_404,plain,
    ( ~ p2(sP1_iProver_def,f3(X0,sP0_iProver_def))
    | p2(c6,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_123]) ).

cnf(c_450,plain,
    ( ~ p2(sP1_iProver_def,X0)
    | p2(sP4_iProver_def,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_119,c_125]) ).

cnf(c_554,plain,
    p2(sP4_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_450]) ).

cnf(c_646,plain,
    ( ~ p2(sP4_iProver_def,X0)
    | p2(sP1_iProver_def,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_554,c_125]) ).

cnf(c_751,plain,
    p2(f3(sP0_iProver_def,f3(c8,sP2_iProver_def)),sP4_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_338]) ).

cnf(c_753,plain,
    p2(f3(sP0_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def),sP4_iProver_def),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_751,c_117]) ).

cnf(c_765,plain,
    ( ~ p2(f3(sP0_iProver_def,sP5_iProver_def),X0)
    | p2(sP4_iProver_def,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_753,c_125]) ).

cnf(c_1533,plain,
    p2(sP4_iProver_def,f3(sP5_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_765]) ).

cnf(c_1570,plain,
    p2(sP1_iProver_def,f3(sP5_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1533,c_646]) ).

cnf(c_1589,plain,
    p2(c6,sP5_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1570,c_404]) ).

cnf(c_1591,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1589,c_128]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SYN557-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:40:30 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.93/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.93/1.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------  iProver source info
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.93/1.19  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.93/1.19  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  clauses                                 19
% 3.93/1.19  conjectures                             13
% 3.93/1.19  EPR                                     6
% 3.93/1.19  Horn                                    19
% 3.93/1.19  unary                                   13
% 3.93/1.19  binary                                  3
% 3.93/1.19  lits                                    28
% 3.93/1.19  lits eq                                 6
% 3.93/1.19  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.93/1.19  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.93/1.19  fd_cond                                 0
% 3.93/1.19  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 3.93/1.19  AC symbols                              0
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------ 
% 3.93/1.19  Current options:
% 3.93/1.19  ------ 
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.93/1.19  
% 3.93/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------