TSTP Solution File: SYN553-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN553-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:00:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 39 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_6,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_6) ).
cnf(p2_5,negated_conjecture,
p2(f8(X1,X2),f8(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_5) ).
cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture,
p2(f8(X1,f8(X2,X3)),f8(f8(X1,X2),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_7) ).
cnf(p2_8,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_8) ).
cnf(not_p2_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f8(f8(f9(c4),c4),f9(c3)),f8(f9(c4),f8(f9(c3),c4))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_9) ).
cnf(p2_1,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_1) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
p2(f8(X1,X2),f8(X2,X1)),
p2_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f8(X2,X3))
| ~ p2(X1,f8(X3,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p2(f8(X1,f8(X2,X3)),f8(f8(X1,X2),X3)),
p2_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X2,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p2(f8(X1,f8(X2,X3)),f8(X3,f8(X1,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p2(X2,X4) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f8(f8(f9(c4),c4),f9(c3)),f8(f9(c4),f8(f9(c3),c4))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p2_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f8(X2,f8(X3,X4)))
| ~ p2(X1,f8(X3,f8(X4,X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X2,X3)
| ~ p2(X1,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f8(f8(f9(c4),c4),f9(c3)),f8(f9(c4),f8(f9(c3),c4))),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,f8(X4,X5)))
| ~ p2(X1,f8(X5,X3))
| ~ p2(X2,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_8]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SYN553-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Mon May 20 13:53:38 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # new_bool_3 with pid 17004 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0V with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0V with pid 17007 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Result found by H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0V
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43 # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43 # Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0V with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.15/0.43 # Processed clauses : 69
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # ...subsumed : 15
% 0.15/0.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 51
% 0.15/0.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Generated clauses : 219
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 189
% 0.15/0.43 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Paramodulations : 219
% 0.15/0.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Total rewrite steps : 31
% 0.15/0.43 # ...of those cached : 13
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 42
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.15/0.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 22
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 130
% 0.15/0.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 345
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 149
% 0.15/0.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 147
% 0.15/0.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 0.15/0.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 34
% 0.15/0.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2928
% 0.15/0.43 # Search garbage collected termcells : 16
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 0.15/0.43
% 0.15/0.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.43 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.15/0.43 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------