TSTP Solution File: SYN541-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN541-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:14:53 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32627/SYN/SYN541-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 77] [nf = 1] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 246] [nf = 2] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 612] [nf = 3] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1082] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1583] [nf = 7] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2101] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2656] [nf = 23] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3211] [nf = 34] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3798] [nf = 55] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4391] [nf = 80] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4984] [nf = 105] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5577] [nf = 130] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6170] [nf = 155] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6763] [nf = 180] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7356] [nf = 205] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7949] [nf = 230] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8542] [nf = 255] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9135] [nf = 280] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9728] [nf = 305] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10321] [nf = 330] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10914] [nf = 355] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11507] [nf = 380] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12100] [nf = 405] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12693] [nf = 430] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13286] [nf = 455] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13879] [nf = 480] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14472] [nf = 505] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15065] [nf = 530] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15658] [nf = 555] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15662] [nf = 555] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15735] [nf = 556] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16018] [nf = 560] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17189] [nf = 643] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20402] [nf = 890] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31802] [nf = 1794] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 62684] [nf = 4573] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 182747] [nf = 22814] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 486842] [nf = 58104] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 10 secs
% [nr = 1663745] [nf = 202712] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 42 secs [nr = 7046732] [nf = 861247] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 200 secs [nr = 31238571] [nf = 4422114] [nu = 0] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 53880951
% resolvents: 46398413 factors: 7482538
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 3
% Total = 3
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 254 [3] = 54525 [4] = 748547 [5] = 3730104 [6] = 11197155 [7] = 16141844
% [8] = 12546649 [9] = 7295327 [10] = 1837901 [11] = 328645
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c2_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [16] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c4_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [18] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)3 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 3
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2105215620
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2055612159
% Number of successful unifications: 53880951
% Number of unification failures: 11822870
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 718733232
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 977924829
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 4
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 2.00
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 109
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 65703821
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 179603
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------