TSTP Solution File: SYN540-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN540-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:14:35 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3810/SYN/SYN540-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 273] [nf = 6] [nu = 3] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1109] [nf = 56] [nu = 10] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3374] [nf = 219] [nu = 33] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8798] [nf = 845] [nu = 110] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22635] [nf = 2807] [nu = 214] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 59616] [nf = 9611] [nu = 593] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 138882] [nf = 21892] [nu = 1852] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 283950] [nf = 46895] [nu = 3526] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 564773] [nf = 97986] [nu = 6938] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 1054113] [nf = 187062] [nu = 14050] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 1827960] [nf = 330550] [nu = 24992] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 27 secs [nr = 3018522] [nf = 557792] [nu = 41748] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 45 secs [nr = 4822809] [nf = 911610] [nu = 68084] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 72 secs [nr = 7394744] [nf = 1445565] [nu = 108823] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 112 secs [nr = 11029200] [nf = 2218384] [nu = 169752] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11926980] [nf = 2411540] [nu = 184226] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11927251] [nf = 2411546] [nu = 184232] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11928373] [nf = 2411599] [nu = 184239] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11933449] [nf = 2411925] [nu = 184262] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11958426] [nf = 2414103] [nu = 184339] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 12097807] [nf = 2429037] [nu = 184449] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 126 secs [nr = 12951555] [nf = 2529071] [nu = 184926] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 148 secs [nr = 19708174] [nf = 3370850] [nu = 187768] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 74474571
% resolvents: 64831565 factors: 9643006
% Number of unit clauses generated: 196642
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.26
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 2 [3] = 1
% [4] = 2 [7] = 2
% Total = 7
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 196642 [2] = 3921368 [3] = 16040185 [4] = 20184209 [5] = 21979453 [6] = 9952674
% [7] = 2013969 [8] = 173155 [9] = 12664 [10] = 252
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [14] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [16] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ndr1_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [19] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)5
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 7
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 899390551
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 362629595
% Number of successful unifications: 74474571
% Number of unification failures: 2201826
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 841759771
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2064940070
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 73917
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 6
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 2.00
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 76676397
% ConstructUnitClause() = 73924
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.11 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 248249
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------