TSTP Solution File: SYN536-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN536-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:12:53 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23685/SYN/SYN536-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 111] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 275] [nf = 16] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 633] [nf = 54] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1452] [nf = 123] [nu = 5] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2908] [nf = 369] [nu = 14] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6464] [nf = 922] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10026] [nf = 1475] [nu = 70] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13593] [nf = 2030] [nu = 98] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17164] [nf = 2587] [nu = 126] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20735] [nf = 3144] [nu = 154] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24315] [nf = 3709] [nu = 182] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27895] [nf = 4274] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31475] [nf = 4839] [nu = 238] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35055] [nf = 5404] [nu = 266] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38635] [nf = 5969] [nu = 294] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42215] [nf = 6534] [nu = 322] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 45795] [nf = 7099] [nu = 350] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 49375] [nf = 7664] [nu = 378] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 52955] [nf = 8229] [nu = 406] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 56535] [nf = 8794] [nu = 434] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 60115] [nf = 9359] [nu = 462] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 63695] [nf = 9924] [nu = 490] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 67275] [nf = 10489] [nu = 518] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 70855] [nf = 11054] [nu = 546] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74435] [nf = 11619] [nu = 574] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 78015] [nf = 12184] [nu = 602] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 81595] [nf = 12749] [nu = 630] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 85175] [nf = 13314] [nu = 658] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 88755] [nf = 13879] [nu = 686] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 88763] [nf = 13879] [nu = 686] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 88866] [nf = 13885] [nu = 686] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 89106] [nf = 13896] [nu = 686] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 89886] [nf = 13983] [nu = 686] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 92625] [nf = 14238] [nu = 691] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 100870] [nf = 15476] [nu = 701] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 130503] [nf = 19170] [nu = 735] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 231910] [nf = 32952] [nu = 769] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 612495] [nf = 1016
% 52] [nu = 803] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 2328248] [nf = 484363] [nu = 837] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 10070628] [nf = 2125052] [nu = 871] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 182 secs [nr = 49963019] [nf = 13124871] [nu = 905] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 102400706
% resolvents: 81275288 factors: 21125418
% Number of unit clauses generated: 935
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 935 [2] = 28595 [3] = 136442 [4] = 895701 [5] = 8390516 [6] = 30164208
% [7] = 38120144 [8] = 19894113 [9] = 3293631 [10] = 1250237 [11] = 212162 [12] = 14022
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1483686528
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 844433367
% Number of successful unifications: 102400706
% Number of unification failures: 10686355
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1258769456
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1380873386
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 4
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 61
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 84
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 113087061
% ConstructUnitClause() = 62
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 341336
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------