TSTP Solution File: SYN532-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN532-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:09:48 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32297/SYN/SYN532-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ..................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 131] [nf = 7] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 277] [nf = 14] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 639] [nf = 48] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1117] [nf = 96] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1805] [nf = 169] [nu = 9] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2797] [nf = 301] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4010] [nf = 505] [nu = 34] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5565] [nf = 738] [nu = 50] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7471] [nf = 1035] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9969] [nf = 1467] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12917] [nf = 1995] [nu = 107] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16434] [nf = 2606] [nu = 141] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20626] [nf = 3324] [nu = 182] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25566] [nf = 4175] [nu = 223] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31645] [nf = 5217] [nu = 266] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38908] [nf = 6518] [nu = 316] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 47304] [nf = 8052] [nu = 382] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 57182] [nf = 9768] [nu = 466] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 68649] [nf = 11752] [nu = 557] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 82117] [nf = 14114] [nu = 650] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 98146] [nf = 16918] [nu = 752] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 116658] [nf = 20242] [nu = 877] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 137899] [nf = 24035] [nu = 1036] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 162449] [nf = 28270] [nu = 1220] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 190755] [nf = 33179] [nu = 1413] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 223737] [nf = 38962] [nu = 1617] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 262001] [nf = 45699] [nu = 1853] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 305643] [nf = 53453] [nu = 2146] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 355437] [nf = 62172] [nu = 2498] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 355439] [nf = 62172] [nu = 2498] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 355569] [nf = 62179] [nu = 2498] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 355879] [nf = 62199] [nu = 2498] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 357494] [nf = 62381] [nu = 2500] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 363899] [nf = 63175] [nu = 2502] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 390122] [nf = 66658] [nu = 2510] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 516240] [nf = 83310] [nu = 2536] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1171225] [nf = 194661] [nu = 2598] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ..
% .
% t = 21 secs [nr = 4805109] [nf = 1049472] [nu = 2660] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 103 secs [nr = 26626052] [nf = 6794768] [nu = 2727] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 98030411
% resolvents: 76849731 factors: 21180680
% Number of unit clauses generated: 2984
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [4] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 2984 [2] = 169631 [3] = 1412599 [4] = 4796258 [5] = 19381630 [6] = 35015041
% [7] = 32372434 [8] = 4430818 [9] = 449016
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1298662997
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 826720900
% Number of successful unifications: 98030411
% Number of unification failures: 1755058
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1087027213
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2118766248
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 7
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 610
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 90
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 99785469
% ConstructUnitClause() = 611
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 326768
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------