TSTP Solution File: SYN520-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN520-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:02:55 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.07s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3006/SYN/SYN520-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 125] [nf = 0] [nu = 14] [ut = 23]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1352] [nf = 12] [nu = 73] [ut = 42]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7291] [nf = 79] [nu = 246] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34843] [nf = 532] [nu = 821] [ut = 45]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 137514] [nf = 3311] [nu = 2732] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 495972] [nf = 13796] [nu = 8846] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 19 secs [nr = 1749936] [nf = 55498] [nu = 27618] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 65 secs [nr = 6056563] [nf = 208960] [nu = 86269] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11033290] [nf = 384361] [nu = 157703] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11034517] [nf = 384373] [nu = 157762] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 11041862] [nf = 384531] [nu = 157935] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 11093924] [nf = 385817] [nu = 158684] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 11443529] [nf = 398071] [nu = 161782] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 143 secs [nr = 13956247] [nf = 488253] [nu = 178378] [ut = 51]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 279 secs [nr = 33190933] [nf = 1319124] [nu = 256935] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 37615769
% resolvents: 36179127 factors: 1436642
% Number of unit clauses generated: 277560
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.74
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 12 [1] = 11 [2] = 19 [3] = 3
% [4] = 1 [5] = 1 [6] = 4 [7] = 1
% Total = 52
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 277560 [2] = 5039437 [3] = 15601141 [4] = 10528304 [5] = 5274018 [6] = 809278
% [7] = 82096 [8] = 3931 [9] = 4
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] c3_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC24 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC25 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC26 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC27 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC28 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC29 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC30 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC31 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC32 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkC33 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] ssSkC34 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] ssSkC35 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] c1_1_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [43] c2_1_1 (+)3 (-)2
% [44] c3_1_1 (+)1 (-)2
% [45] c4_1_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [46] c5_1_1 (+)2 (-)4
% [47] ndr1_1_1 (+)7 (-)0
% [48] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] ssSkP10_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [50] ssSkP11_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [51] ssSkP12_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [52] ssSkP13_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [55] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [56] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [57] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] ssSkP6_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [59] ssSkP7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] ssSkP8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [61] ssSkP9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [62] c1_2_2 (+)2 (-)2
% [63] c2_2_2 (+)3 (-)2
% [64] c3_2_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [65] c4_2_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [66] c5_2_2 (+)2 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)31 (-)21
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 52
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1064724925
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 650779104
% Number of successful unifications: 37615769
% Number of unification failures: 3804146
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 33
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 651260254
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1953076284
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 203585
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 42
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 63
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.67
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 282
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 41419915
% ConstructUnitClause() = 203625
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.22 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 125386
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------