TSTP Solution File: SYN514-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN514-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:00:31 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27864/SYN/SYN514-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 527] [nf = 20] [nu = 1] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1950] [nf = 76] [nu = 8] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7753] [nf = 411] [nu = 84] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25934] [nf = 1681] [nu = 248] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 83736] [nf = 7062] [nu = 715] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 261261] [nf = 25096] [nu = 2094] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 839204] [nf = 92310] [nu = 7134] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 19 secs [nr = 2672829] [nf = 314897] [nu = 23614] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 62 secs [nr = 8634770] [nf = 1079250] [nu = 82177] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 16951543] [nf = 2182410] [nu = 169443] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 16952083] [nf = 2182430] [nu = 169456] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 16954450] [nf = 2182580] [nu = 169487] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 16968848] [nf = 2183348] [nu = 169563] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 17059888] [nf = 2190461] [nu = 169727] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 126 secs [nr = 17706456] [nf = 2242788] [nu = 170198] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 149 secs [nr = 22565257] [nf = 2687947] [nu = 171641] [ut = 6]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 61466871
% resolvents: 55387070 factors: 6079801
% Number of unit clauses generated: 177099
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.29
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1 [2] = 1 [4] = 4
% Total = 6
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 177099 [2] = 5755381 [3] = 18295059 [4] = 12165781 [5] = 16693254 [6] = 7496415
% [7] = 847023 [8] = 36247 [9] = 591 [10] = 17 [11] = 4
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] c3_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [26] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] c5_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [28] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)3 (-)3
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 6
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1005812971
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 528131751
% Number of successful unifications: 61466871
% Number of unification failures: 1079532
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 706517473
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1716227260
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 123927
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 5
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 2.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 163
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 62546403
% ConstructUnitClause() = 123932
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.15 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 204890
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------