TSTP Solution File: SYN510-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN510-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:56:29 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8477/SYN/SYN510-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 180] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 360] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2340] [nf = 90] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10111] [nf = 990] [nu = 90] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17885] [nf = 1892] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25728] [nf = 2838] [nu = 270] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33571] [nf = 3784] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 41476] [nf = 4784] [nu = 450] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49381] [nf = 5784] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 57286] [nf = 6784] [nu = 630] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 65191] [nf = 7784] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 73096] [nf = 8784] [nu = 810] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 81001] [nf = 9784] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 88906] [nf = 10784] [nu = 990] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 96811] [nf = 11784] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 104716] [nf = 12784] [nu = 1170] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 112621] [nf = 13784] [nu = 1260] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 120526] [nf = 14784] [nu = 1350] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 128431] [nf = 15784] [nu = 1440] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 136336] [nf = 16784] [nu = 1530] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 144241] [nf = 17784] [nu = 1620] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 152146] [nf = 18784] [nu = 1710] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 160051] [nf = 19784] [nu = 1800] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 167956] [nf = 20784] [nu = 1890] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 175861] [nf = 21784] [nu = 1980] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 183766] [nf = 22784] [nu = 2070] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 191671] [nf = 23784] [nu = 2160] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 199576] [nf = 24784] [nu = 2250] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 207481] [nf = 25784] [nu = 2340] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 207481] [nf = 25784] [nu = 2340] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 207661] [nf = 25784] [nu = 2340] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 207841] [nf = 25784] [nu = 2340] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 209821] [nf = 25874] [nu = 2340] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 219948] [nf = 26838] [nu = 2430] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 333917] [nf = 33196] [nu = 2520] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 1812222] [nf = 136011] [nu = 2610
% ] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 7480425] [nf = 796444] [nu = 2700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 269 secs [nr = 36963862] [nf = 5018446] [nu = 2790] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 47391701
% resolvents: 41782833 factors: 5608868
% Number of unit clauses generated: 2794
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.01
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 2794 [2] = 37546 [3] = 284160 [4] = 1127476 [5] = 10401085 [6] = 22527161
% [7] = 12433589 [8] = 567039 [9] = 10851
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [33] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 320757311
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1075626187
% Number of successful unifications: 47391701
% Number of unification failures: 112161085
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2482938123
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3433027180
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 179
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 159552786
% ConstructUnitClause() = 180
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 157972
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------