TSTP Solution File: SYN497-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN497-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:50:07 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.00s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP26572/SYN/SYN497-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 312] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1347] [nf = 132] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2382] [nf = 252] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3427] [nf = 380] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4472] [nf = 508] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5522] [nf = 640] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6572] [nf = 772] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7622] [nf = 904] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8672] [nf = 1036] [nu = 96] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9722] [nf = 1168] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10772] [nf = 1300] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11822] [nf = 1432] [nu = 132] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12872] [nf = 1564] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13922] [nf = 1696] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14972] [nf = 1828] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16022] [nf = 1960] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17072] [nf = 2092] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18122] [nf = 2224] [nu = 204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19172] [nf = 2356] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20222] [nf = 2488] [nu = 228] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21272] [nf = 2620] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22322] [nf = 2752] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23372] [nf = 2884] [nu = 264] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24422] [nf = 3016] [nu = 276] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25472] [nf = 3148] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26522] [nf = 3280] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27572] [nf = 3412] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27572] [nf = 3412] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27596] [nf = 3412] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27620] [nf = 3412] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27884] [nf = 3424] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 29038] [nf = 3548] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33147] [nf = 3886] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59586] [nf = 6921] [nu = 348] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 162677] [nf = 25006] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 437136] [nf = 73807] [nu = 372] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth =
% 10 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 2259808] [nf = 317177] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 60 secs [nr = 12787070] [nf = 2311661] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 81074040
% resolvents: 65668055 factors: 15405985
% Number of unit clauses generated: 408
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 408 [2] = 8472 [3] = 191094 [4] = 2926114 [5] = 12079026 [6] = 32651500
% [7] = 23349502 [8] = 7724144 [9] = 2143780
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [15] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 101905614
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1298223209
% Number of successful unifications: 81074040
% Number of unification failures: 64535918
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1479693913
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2241337282
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 23
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 67
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 145609958
% ConstructUnitClause() = 24
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 270247
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------