TSTP Solution File: SYN489-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN489-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:45:21 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP2740/SYN/SYN489-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 168] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 320] [nf = 4] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1192] [nf = 44] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4393] [nf = 408] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7594] [nf = 772] [nu = 88] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10900] [nf = 1208] [nu = 128] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14206] [nf = 1644] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17586] [nf = 2144] [nu = 208] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20966] [nf = 2644] [nu = 248] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24346] [nf = 3144] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27726] [nf = 3644] [nu = 328] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31106] [nf = 4144] [nu = 368] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34486] [nf = 4644] [nu = 408] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 37866] [nf = 5144] [nu = 448] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 41246] [nf = 5644] [nu = 488] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44626] [nf = 6144] [nu = 528] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48006] [nf = 6644] [nu = 568] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 51386] [nf = 7144] [nu = 608] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54766] [nf = 7644] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58146] [nf = 8144] [nu = 688] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61526] [nf = 8644] [nu = 728] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 64906] [nf = 9144] [nu = 768] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 68286] [nf = 9644] [nu = 808] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71666] [nf = 10144] [nu = 848] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 75046] [nf = 10644] [nu = 888] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 78426] [nf = 11144] [nu = 928] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 81806] [nf = 11644] [nu = 968] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 85186] [nf = 12144] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 88566] [nf = 12644] [nu = 1048] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 88582] [nf = 12644] [nu = 1048] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 88734] [nf = 12644] [nu = 1048] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 88886] [nf = 12648] [nu = 1052] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 89758] [nf = 12688] [nu = 1056] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 94859] [nf = 13109] [nu = 1096] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 173606] [nf = 17723] [nu = 1136] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 900879] [nf = 73745] [nu = 1176] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t
% = 17 secs [nr = 3355235] [nf = 315685] [nu = 1216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 138 secs [nr = 19742694] [nf = 2169373] [nu = 1256] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 47637712
% resolvents: 42540832 factors: 5096880
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1284
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1284 [2] = 20106 [3] = 157821 [4] = 1240279 [5] = 8569010 [6] = 22468090
% [7] = 11848684 [8] = 3272245 [9] = 60193
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [33] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 211327429
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1882779045
% Number of successful unifications: 47637712
% Number of unification failures: 78556201
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2013514999
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2523008894
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 79
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 126193913
% ConstructUnitClause() = 80
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 158792
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------