TSTP Solution File: SYN469-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN469-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:31:25 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP595/SYN/SYN469-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 96] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 624] [nf = 24] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2717] [nf = 264] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4816] [nf = 508] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6974] [nf = 788] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9132] [nf = 1068] [nu = 96] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11359] [nf = 1408] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13586] [nf = 1748] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15813] [nf = 2088] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18040] [nf = 2428] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20267] [nf = 2768] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22494] [nf = 3108] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24721] [nf = 3448] [nu = 264] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 26948] [nf = 3788] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29175] [nf = 4128] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31402] [nf = 4468] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33629] [nf = 4808] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35856] [nf = 5148] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38083] [nf = 5488] [nu = 408] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40310] [nf = 5828] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42537] [nf = 6168] [nu = 456] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44764] [nf = 6508] [nu = 480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46991] [nf = 6848] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49218] [nf = 7188] [nu = 528] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 51445] [nf = 7528] [nu = 552] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 53672] [nf = 7868] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 55899] [nf = 8208] [nu = 600] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58126] [nf = 8548] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58126] [nf = 8548] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58174] [nf = 8548] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58222] [nf = 8548] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58818] [nf = 8573] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 64308] [nf = 8920] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 138875] [nf = 13789] [nu = 672] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 792013] [nf = 61983] [nu = 696] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 3815420] [nf = 432001] [nu = 720]
% [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 160 secs [nr = 19177331] [nf = 3137822] [nu = 744] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 41594653
% resolvents: 35381328 factors: 6213325
% Number of unit clauses generated: 760
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 760 [2] = 11878 [3] = 119400 [4] = 1028492 [5] = 8444051 [6] = 20962986
% [7] = 8601121 [8] = 2343239 [9] = 82726
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [30] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 227872342
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1703416110
% Number of successful unifications: 41594653
% Number of unification failures: 106084690
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2067010872
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2838125368
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 47
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 97
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 147679343
% ConstructUnitClause() = 48
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 138649
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------