TSTP Solution File: SYN445-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN445-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:17:31 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19570/SYN/SYN445-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 120] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 232] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1068] [nf = 40] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4225] [nf = 402] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7385] [nf = 766] [nu = 80] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10615] [nf = 1178] [nu = 118] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13845] [nf = 1590] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17148] [nf = 2066] [nu = 194] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20451] [nf = 2542] [nu = 232] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23754] [nf = 3018] [nu = 270] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27057] [nf = 3494] [nu = 308] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30360] [nf = 3970] [nu = 346] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33663] [nf = 4446] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36966] [nf = 4922] [nu = 422] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40269] [nf = 5398] [nu = 460] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43572] [nf = 5874] [nu = 498] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46875] [nf = 6350] [nu = 536] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 50178] [nf = 6826] [nu = 574] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 53481] [nf = 7302] [nu = 612] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56784] [nf = 7778] [nu = 650] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 60087] [nf = 8254] [nu = 688] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 63390] [nf = 8730] [nu = 726] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 66693] [nf = 9206] [nu = 764] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 69996] [nf = 9682] [nu = 802] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 73299] [nf = 10158] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 76602] [nf = 10634] [nu = 878] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 79905] [nf = 11110] [nu = 916] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 83208] [nf = 11586] [nu = 954] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 86511] [nf = 12062] [nu = 992] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 86519] [nf = 12062] [nu = 992] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 86631] [nf = 12062] [nu = 992] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 86743] [nf = 12064] [nu = 994] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 87849] [nf = 12106] [nu = 996] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 97918] [nf = 12811] [nu = 1034] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 172147] [nf = 17196] [nu = 1072] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 935930] [nf = 73667] [nu = 1110] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 7014464] [nf =
% 741463] [nu = 1148] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 266 secs [nr = 37131050] [nf = 5694325] [nu = 1186] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 48836008
% resolvents: 42210959 factors: 6625049
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1192
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1192 [2] = 35434 [3] = 281298 [4] = 1677591 [5] = 11042725 [6] = 29034934
% [7] = 5072604 [8] = 1651131 [9] = 39099
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [31] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 241436499
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1108394700
% Number of successful unifications: 48836008
% Number of unification failures: 134961485
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2330907938
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3438123199
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 75
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 99
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 183797493
% ConstructUnitClause() = 76
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 162787
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------