TSTP Solution File: SYN442-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN442-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:14:40 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6575/SYN/SYN442-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 96] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 184] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 754] [nf = 28] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2887] [nf = 270] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5020] [nf = 512] [nu = 56] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7222] [nf = 804] [nu = 82] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9424] [nf = 1096] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11673] [nf = 1428] [nu = 134] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13922] [nf = 1760] [nu = 160] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16171] [nf = 2092] [nu = 186] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18420] [nf = 2424] [nu = 212] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20669] [nf = 2756] [nu = 238] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22918] [nf = 3088] [nu = 264] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25167] [nf = 3420] [nu = 290] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27416] [nf = 3752] [nu = 316] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29665] [nf = 4084] [nu = 342] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31914] [nf = 4416] [nu = 368] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34163] [nf = 4748] [nu = 394] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36412] [nf = 5080] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38661] [nf = 5412] [nu = 446] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40910] [nf = 5744] [nu = 472] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43159] [nf = 6076] [nu = 498] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45408] [nf = 6408] [nu = 524] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47657] [nf = 6740] [nu = 550] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49906] [nf = 7072] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52155] [nf = 7404] [nu = 602] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54404] [nf = 7736] [nu = 628] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56653] [nf = 8068] [nu = 654] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58902] [nf = 8400] [nu = 680] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58910] [nf = 8400] [nu = 680] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58998] [nf = 8400] [nu = 680] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59086] [nf = 8402] [nu = 682] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59798] [nf = 8431] [nu = 684] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 67261] [nf = 8850] [nu = 710] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 153117] [nf = 14108] [nu = 736] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 776999] [nf = 61647] [nu = 762] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 28 secs [nr = 5094953] [nf = 512632] [nu = 7
% 88] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 223 secs [nr = 27381563] [nf = 3831839] [nu = 814] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 42786204
% resolvents: 37206151 factors: 5580053
% Number of unit clauses generated: 824
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 824 [2] = 13572 [3] = 126800 [4] = 1192827 [5] = 9034474 [6] = 25240045
% [7] = 5695580 [8] = 1421110 [9] = 60972
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [32] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 240956016
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1721079442
% Number of successful unifications: 42786204
% Number of unification failures: 113963795
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1994406418
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2946283181
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 51
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 101
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 156749999
% ConstructUnitClause() = 52
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 142621
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------