TSTP Solution File: SYN436-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN436-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:12:17 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.00s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19117/SYN/SYN436-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 60] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 120] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 780] [nf = 30] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3374] [nf = 330] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5974] [nf = 634] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8612] [nf = 964] [nu = 90] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11250] [nf = 1294] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13943] [nf = 1672] [nu = 150] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16636] [nf = 2050] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19329] [nf = 2428] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22022] [nf = 2806] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24715] [nf = 3184] [nu = 270] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27408] [nf = 3562] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30101] [nf = 3940] [nu = 330] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 32794] [nf = 4318] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35487] [nf = 4696] [nu = 390] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38180] [nf = 5074] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40873] [nf = 5452] [nu = 450] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43566] [nf = 5830] [nu = 480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46259] [nf = 6208] [nu = 510] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48952] [nf = 6586] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 51645] [nf = 6964] [nu = 570] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 54338] [nf = 7342] [nu = 600] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 57031] [nf = 7720] [nu = 630] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 59724] [nf = 8098] [nu = 660] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 62417] [nf = 8476] [nu = 690] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 65110] [nf = 8854] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 67803] [nf = 9232] [nu = 750] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 70496] [nf = 9610] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 70496] [nf = 9610] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 70556] [nf = 9610] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 70616] [nf = 9610] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 71340] [nf = 9642] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 76154] [nf = 10026] [nu = 810] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 117271] [nf = 13277] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 528126] [nf = 44069] [nu = 870] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 2539918] [nf = 274752] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a p
% roof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 87 secs [nr = 11826001] [nf = 1815734] [nu = 930] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 46179170
% resolvents: 39567957 factors: 6611213
% Number of unit clauses generated: 960
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 960 [2] = 15762 [3] = 168112 [4] = 1369308 [5] = 9135438 [6] = 20642571
% [7] = 11565970 [8] = 3190267 [9] = 90782
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [29] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 183888812
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1599335319
% Number of successful unifications: 46179170
% Number of unification failures: 105521493
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2333584392
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3126243666
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 59
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 95
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 151700663
% ConstructUnitClause() = 60
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 153931
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 305 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------