TSTP Solution File: SYN413+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYN413+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:48:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.14 % Problem : SYN413+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Wed May 8 20:14:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.54 % Version: 1.5
% 0.22/0.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.54 fof(kalish256,conjecture,((![Z]:(?[Y]:(![X]:(f(X,Y)<=>(f(X,Z)&(~f(X,X)))))))=>(~(?[V]:(![U]:f(U,V))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', kalish256)).
% 0.22/0.54 fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~((![Z]:(?[Y]:(![X]:(f(X,Y)<=>(f(X,Z)&(~f(X,X)))))))=>(~(?[V]:(![U]:f(U,V)))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[kalish256])).
% 0.22/0.54 fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~((![Z]:(?[Y]:(![X]:(f(X,Y)<=>(f(X,Z)&~f(X,X))))))=>(~(?[V]:(![U]:f(U,V)))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.22/0.54 fof(c2,negated_conjecture,((![Z]:(?[Y]:(![X]:((~f(X,Y)|(f(X,Z)&~f(X,X)))&((~f(X,Z)|f(X,X))|f(X,Y))))))&(?[V]:(![U]:f(U,V)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.22/0.54 fof(c3,negated_conjecture,((![Z]:(?[Y]:((![X]:(~f(X,Y)|(f(X,Z)&~f(X,X))))&(![X]:((~f(X,Z)|f(X,X))|f(X,Y))))))&(?[V]:(![U]:f(U,V)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.22/0.54 fof(c4,negated_conjecture,((![X2]:(?[X3]:((![X4]:(~f(X4,X3)|(f(X4,X2)&~f(X4,X4))))&(![X5]:((~f(X5,X2)|f(X5,X5))|f(X5,X3))))))&(?[X6]:(![X7]:f(X7,X6)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.22/0.54 fof(c6,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:(![X4]:(![X5]:(![X7]:(((~f(X4,skolem0001(X2))|(f(X4,X2)&~f(X4,X4)))&((~f(X5,X2)|f(X5,X5))|f(X5,skolem0001(X2))))&f(X7,skolem0002)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c5,negated_conjecture,((![X2]:((![X4]:(~f(X4,skolem0001(X2))|(f(X4,X2)&~f(X4,X4))))&(![X5]:((~f(X5,X2)|f(X5,X5))|f(X5,skolem0001(X2))))))&(![X7]:f(X7,skolem0002))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c4])).])).
% 0.22/0.54 fof(c7,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:(![X4]:(![X5]:(![X7]:((((~f(X4,skolem0001(X2))|f(X4,X2))&(~f(X4,skolem0001(X2))|~f(X4,X4)))&((~f(X5,X2)|f(X5,X5))|f(X5,skolem0001(X2))))&f(X7,skolem0002)))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,~f(X11,skolem0001(X12))|~f(X11,X11),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c12,plain,~f(skolem0001(X13),skolem0001(X13)),inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c9])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,f(X8,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c10,negated_conjecture,~f(X14,X15)|f(X14,X14)|f(X14,skolem0001(X15)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c13,plain,f(X16,X16)|f(X16,skolem0001(skolem0002)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c10, c11])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c18,plain,f(skolem0001(X18),skolem0001(skolem0002)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c13, c12])).
% 0.22/0.54 cnf(c26,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c18, c12])).
% 0.22/0.54 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.54
% 0.22/0.54 % Initial clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.54 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.22/0.54 % Factors computed : 2
% 0.22/0.54 % Resolvents computed: 13
% 0.22/0.54 % Tautologies deleted: 1
% 0.22/0.54 % Forward subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 % Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.54 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.22/0.54 % User time : 0.154 s
% 0.22/0.54 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.22/0.54 % Total time : 0.170 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------