TSTP Solution File: SYN411+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : SYN411+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:22:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.58s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 79 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 77 ( 36 ~; 30 |; 0 &)
% ( 10 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 7 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 58 ( 52 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f58,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f19,f23,f32,f43,f50,f55,f57]) ).
fof(f57,plain,
( ~ spl9_2
| spl9_5 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f56]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl9_2
| spl9_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f31,f18]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
( ! [X3,X4,X5] : f(X3,X4,X5)
| ~ spl9_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
( spl9_2
<=> ! [X4,X5,X3] : f(X3,X4,X5) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_2])]) ).
fof(f31,plain,
( ~ f(sK3,sK4,sK5)
| spl9_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
( spl9_5
<=> f(sK3,sK4,sK5) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_5])]) ).
fof(f55,plain,
( ~ spl9_3
| spl9_4 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl9_3
| spl9_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f48,f33]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
( ! [X0,X1] : ~ sP6(X0,X1)
| ~ spl9_3 ),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f22,f8]) ).
fof(f8,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ sP6(X0,X1)
| sP7(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8_D]) ).
fof(f8_D,plain,
! [X1] :
( ! [X0] : ~ sP6(X0,X1)
<=> ~ sP7(X1) ),
introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP7])]) ).
fof(f22,plain,
( ! [X1] : ~ sP7(X1)
| ~ spl9_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( spl9_3
<=> ! [X1] : ~ sP7(X1) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_3])]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
( sP6(sK0,sK1)
| spl9_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f27,f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( f(X0,X1,X2)
| sP6(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6_D]) ).
fof(f6_D,plain,
! [X1,X0] :
( ! [X2] : f(X0,X1,X2)
<=> ~ sP6(X0,X1) ),
introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP6])]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
( ~ f(sK0,sK1,sK2)
| spl9_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
( spl9_4
<=> f(sK0,sK1,sK2) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_4])]) ).
fof(f50,plain,
( ~ spl9_2
| spl9_4 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f44]) ).
fof(f44,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl9_2
| spl9_4 ),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f18,f27]) ).
fof(f43,plain,
( ~ spl9_3
| spl9_5 ),
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f42]) ).
fof(f42,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl9_3
| spl9_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f33]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
( sP6(sK3,sK4)
| spl9_5 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f6,f31]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
( ~ spl9_4
| ~ spl9_5 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f5,f29,f25]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( ~ f(sK3,sK4,sK5)
| ~ f(sK0,sK1,sK2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
( ! [X0,X1,X2] : f(X0,X1,X2)
<~> ! [X3,X4,X5] : f(X3,X4,X5) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X0,X1,X2] : f(X0,X1,X2)
<=> ~ ? [X3,X4,X5] : ~ f(X3,X4,X5) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( ! [X0,X1,X2] : f(X0,X1,X2)
<=> ~ ? [X3,X4,X5] : ~ f(X3,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish250) ).
fof(f23,plain,
( spl9_1
| spl9_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f21,f13]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
( spl9_1
<=> sP8 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_1])]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ sP7(X1)
| sP8 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10_D]) ).
fof(f10_D,plain,
( ! [X1] : ~ sP7(X1)
<=> ~ sP8 ),
introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP8])]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
( ~ spl9_1
| spl9_2 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f17,f13]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X3,X4,X5] :
( f(X3,X4,X5)
| ~ sP8 ),
inference(general_splitting,[],[f9,f10_D]) ).
fof(f9,plain,
! [X3,X1,X4,X5] :
( f(X3,X4,X5)
| ~ sP7(X1) ),
inference(general_splitting,[],[f7,f8_D]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
! [X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( f(X3,X4,X5)
| ~ sP6(X0,X1) ),
inference(general_splitting,[],[f4,f6_D]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( f(X3,X4,X5)
| f(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN411+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 14:48:53 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14564)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14565)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14567)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14566)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)First to succeed.
% 0.58/0.74 % (14568)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14569)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-14533"
% 0.58/0.74 % (14566)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.74 % (14564)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.74 % (14567)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.58/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.58/0.74
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)Memory used [KB]: 982
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.58/0.74 % (14570)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.58/0.74 % (14533)Success in time 0.376 s
% 0.58/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------