TSTP Solution File: SYN411+1 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SYN411+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 09:02:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  16   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   6 sgn  39   !;  21   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kalish250,conjecture,
    ( ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z)
  <=> ~ ? [U,V,W] : ~ f(U,V,W) ) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z)
   => ! [U,V,W] : f(U,V,W) ),
    inference(strip,[],[kalish250]) ).

fof(subgoal_1,plain,
    ( ~ ? [U,V,W] : ~ f(U,V,W)
   => ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z) ),
    inference(strip,[],[kalish250]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z)
     => ! [U,V,W] : f(U,V,W) ),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ( ? [U,V,W] : ~ f(U,V,W)
    & ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ? [U,V,W] : ~ f(U,V,W),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ~ f(skolemFOFtoCNF_U,skolemFOFtoCNF_V,skolemFOFtoCNF_W),
    inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ~ f(skolemFOFtoCNF_U,skolemFOFtoCNF_V,skolemFOFtoCNF_W),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    f(X,Y,Z),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    f(skolemFOFtoCNF_U,skolemFOFtoCNF_V,skolemFOFtoCNF_W),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(X,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_U)),bind(Y,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_V)),bind(Z,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_W))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(skolemFOFtoCNF_U,skolemFOFtoCNF_V,skolemFOFtoCNF_W) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_0]) ).

fof(negate_1_0,plain,
    ~ ( ~ ? [U,V,W] : ~ f(U,V,W)
     => ! [X,Y,Z] : f(X,Y,Z) ),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_1]) ).

fof(normalize_1_0,plain,
    ( ? [X,Y,Z] : ~ f(X,Y,Z)
    & ! [U,V,W] : f(U,V,W) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_1,plain,
    ? [X,Y,Z] : ~ f(X,Y,Z),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_2,plain,
    ~ f(skolemFOFtoCNF_X,skolemFOFtoCNF_Y,skolemFOFtoCNF_Z),
    inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_1_1]) ).

fof(normalize_1_3,plain,
    ! [U,V,W] : f(U,V,W),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_1_0]) ).

fof(normalize_1_4,plain,
    ! [U,V,W] : f(U,V,W),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_1_3]) ).

cnf(refute_1_0,plain,
    ~ f(skolemFOFtoCNF_X,skolemFOFtoCNF_Y,skolemFOFtoCNF_Z),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_1_2]) ).

cnf(refute_1_1,plain,
    f(U,V,W),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_1_4]) ).

cnf(refute_1_2,plain,
    f(skolemFOFtoCNF_X,skolemFOFtoCNF_Y,skolemFOFtoCNF_Z),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_1_1:[bind(U,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_X)),bind(V,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_Y)),bind(W,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_Z))]]) ).

cnf(refute_1_3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( f(skolemFOFtoCNF_X,skolemFOFtoCNF_Y,skolemFOFtoCNF_Z) )],[refute_1_2,refute_1_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SYN411+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 22:22:15 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.33  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.11/0.33  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.33  
% 0.11/0.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.33  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------