TSTP Solution File: SYN409+1 by LEO-II---1.7.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LEO-II---1.7.0
% Problem  : SYN409+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 08:26:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  34 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  154 (  39 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  164 (  53   ~;  18   |;  13   &;  73   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0   ^  48   !;   0   ?;  48   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_f,type,
    f: $i > $o ).

thf(tp_sK1_Z,type,
    sK1_Z: $i ).

thf(tp_sK2_Y,type,
    sK2_Y: $i ).

thf(tp_sK3_X,type,
    sK3_X: $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X )
  <=> ! [Y: $i,Z: $i] :
        ( ( f @ Y )
        & ( f @ Z ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kalish246) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X )
    <=> ! [Y: $i,Z: $i] :
          ( ( f @ Y )
          & ( f @ Z ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X )
    <=> ! [Y: $i,Z: $i] :
          ( ( f @ Y )
          & ( f @ Z ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X )
     => ! [Y: $i,Z: $i] :
          ( ( f @ Y )
          & ( f @ Z ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(split_conjecture,[split_conjecture(split,[])],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ! [Y: $i,Z: $i] :
          ( ( f @ Y )
          & ( f @ Z ) )
     => ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(split_conjecture,[split_conjecture(split,[])],[3]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X )
         => ! [Y: $i,Z: $i] :
              ( ( f @ Y )
              & ( f @ Z ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ! [Y: $i,Z: $i] :
              ( ( f @ Y )
              & ( f @ Z ) )
         => ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X )
      & ( ~ ( f @ sK2_Y )
        | ~ ( f @ sK1_Z ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[6]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( ! [Y: $i] : ( f @ Y )
      & ! [Z: $i] : ( f @ Z )
      & ~ ( f @ sK3_X ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[7]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ( ( ! [X: $i] : ( f @ X )
      & ( ~ ( f @ sK2_Y )
        | ~ ( f @ sK1_Z ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 )
          | ~ ( ~ ( f @ sK2_Y )
              | ~ ( f @ sK1_Z ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 )
      | ~ ( ~ ( f @ sK2_Y )
          | ~ ( f @ sK1_Z ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ~ ( f @ sK2_Y )
          | ~ ( f @ sK1_Z ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ( ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( f @ sK2_Y )
      | ~ ( f @ sK1_Z ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i] :
      ( ( f @ SV1 )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ ( f @ sK2_Y ) )
      = $true )
    | ( ( ~ ( f @ sK1_Z ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK2_Y )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ~ ( f @ sK1_Z ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ( ( ( f @ sK1_Z )
      = $false )
    | ( ( f @ sK2_Y )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[17,20]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ( ( ! [Y: $i] : ( f @ Y )
      & ! [Z: $i] : ( f @ Z )
      & ~ ( f @ sK3_X ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 )
                | ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
          | ~ ~ ( f @ sK3_X ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 )
            | ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
      | ~ ~ ( f @ sK3_X ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 )
            | ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ( ( ~ ~ ( f @ sK3_X ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 )
          | ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( f @ sK3_X ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 )
      | ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ( ( f @ sK3_X )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ( ( ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ( ( ! [SX0: $i] : ( f @ SX0 ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i] :
      ( ( f @ SV2 )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i] :
      ( ( f @ SV3 )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[30,36,35]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[37,21]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem  : SYN409+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s
% 0.08/0.26  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.26  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.26  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 06:24:14 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.26  
% 0.08/0.26   No.of.Axioms: 0
% 0.08/0.26  
% 0.08/0.26   Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.08/0.26  
% 0.08/0.26   Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.08/0.26  (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:600,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:2,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:0,translation:fof_full).
% 0.12/0.28  
% 0.12/0.28  ********************************
% 0.12/0.28  *   All subproblems solved!    *
% 0.12/0.28  ********************************
% 0.12/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:74,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:37,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
% 0.12/0.29  
% 0.12/0.29  %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.12/0.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.29  
% 0.12/0.29  %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.12/0.29  %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 38 ****
% 0.12/0.29  %**** clause counter: 37 ****
% 0.12/0.29  
% 0.12/0.29  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:0,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:74,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:37,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------