TSTP Solution File: SYN398+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN398+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:23:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN398+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 03:04:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.12/0.34 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.12/0.34 [0.000038s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 Start search
% 0.12/0.34 nb_step : 1 - limit : 2
% 0.12/0.34 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 [0] BETA_NOT_EQUIV : ~(! [X2_2] : ((p & f(X2_2))) <=> (p & ! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3))))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [1] ~! [X2_2] : ((p & f(X2_2))), (p & ! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3)))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [2] ! [X2_2] : ((p & f(X2_2))), ~(p & ! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3)))
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [2] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(p & ! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3)))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [3] ~p
% 0.12/0.34 -> [4] ~! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3))
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [3] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] : ((p & f(X2_2)))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [8] (p & f(X2_1_0))
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [8] ALPHA_AND : (p & f(X2_1_0))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [10] p, f(X2_1_0)
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [10] CLOSURE : p
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [4] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [5] ~f(skolem_Y33)
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [5] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X2_2] : ((p & f(X2_2)))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [7] (p & f(X2_0_0))
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [7] ALPHA_AND : (p & f(X2_0_0))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [11] p, f(X2_0_0)
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [11] CLOSURE : f(X2_0_0)
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [1] ALPHA_AND : (p & ! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3)))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [6] p, ! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3))
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [6] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X2_2] : ((p & f(X2_2)))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [9] ~(p & f(skolem_X22))
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [9] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(p & f(skolem_X22))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [12] ~p
% 0.12/0.34 -> [13] ~f(skolem_X22)
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [12] CLOSURE : ~p
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [13] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [Y3_3] : (f(Y3_3))
% 0.12/0.34 -> [14] f(Y3_0_0)
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 [14] CLOSURE : f(Y3_0_0)
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34 [0.004572s][1][Res] 7 goroutines created
% 0.12/0.34 ==== Result ====
% 0.12/0.34 [0.004604s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------