TSTP Solution File: SYN375+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN375+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 11:57:06 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.62s 0.84s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  165 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  190 (  71   ~;  77   |;  17   &)
%                                         (  17 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (  42   !;  31   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f81,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f34,f48,f49,f66,f68,f70,f74,f78,f80]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_2
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_2
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f46,f29]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ! [X5] : ~ big_p(X5)
    | ~ spl7_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( spl7_2
  <=> ! [X5] : ~ big_p(X5) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_2])]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | ~ spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ( spl7_6
  <=> big_p(sK1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_6])]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_1
    | ~ spl7_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_1
    | ~ spl7_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f29]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( big_p(sK2)
    | ~ spl7_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( spl7_1
  <=> big_p(sK2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_1])]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_2
    | ~ spl7_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_2
    | ~ spl7_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f29,f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : big_p(X3)
    | ~ spl7_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ( spl7_5
  <=> ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_5])]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ( spl7_3
    | ~ spl7_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl7_3
    | ~ spl7_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f33,f42]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(sK0)
    | spl7_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( spl7_3
  <=> big_p(sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_3])]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ( spl7_1
    | ~ spl7_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl7_1
    | ~ spl7_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f26,f42]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(sK2)
    | spl7_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_2
    | ~ spl7_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl7_2
    | ~ spl7_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f38,f29]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( big_p(sK3)
    | ~ spl7_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( spl7_4
  <=> big_p(sK3) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl7_4])]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ( spl7_2
    | spl7_5
    | spl7_2
    | spl7_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f18,f41,f28,f41,f28]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X11,X8,X7,X12] :
      ( big_p(X7)
      | ~ big_p(X8)
      | big_p(X11)
      | ~ big_p(X12) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ! [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
          | ~ big_p(sK0) )
        & ( big_p(sK1)
          | ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ) )
      | ( ( ! [X5] : ~ big_p(X5)
          | ~ big_p(sK2) )
        & ( big_p(sK3)
          | big_p(sK2) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ! [X7] : big_p(X7)
          | ! [X8] : ~ big_p(X8) )
        & ( big_p(sK4)
          | ~ big_p(sK5) ) )
      | ! [X11] :
          ( ( big_p(X11)
            | ! [X12] : ~ big_p(X12) )
          & ( big_p(sK6)
            | ~ big_p(X11) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5,sK6])],[f6,f13,f12,f11,f10,f9,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X1] : ~ big_p(X1)
   => ~ big_p(sK0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
   => big_p(sK1) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X4] :
        ( ( ! [X5] : ~ big_p(X5)
          | ~ big_p(X4) )
        & ( ? [X6] : big_p(X6)
          | big_p(X4) ) )
   => ( ( ! [X5] : ~ big_p(X5)
        | ~ big_p(sK2) )
      & ( ? [X6] : big_p(X6)
        | big_p(sK2) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X6] : big_p(X6)
   => big_p(sK3) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X9] : big_p(X9)
   => big_p(sK4) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( ? [X10] : ~ big_p(X10)
   => ~ big_p(sK5) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ? [X13] : big_p(X13)
   => big_p(sK6) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ! [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
          | ? [X1] : ~ big_p(X1) )
        & ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
          | ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ) )
      | ? [X4] :
          ( ( ! [X5] : ~ big_p(X5)
            | ~ big_p(X4) )
          & ( ? [X6] : big_p(X6)
            | big_p(X4) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ! [X7] : big_p(X7)
          | ! [X8] : ~ big_p(X8) )
        & ( ? [X9] : big_p(X9)
          | ? [X10] : ~ big_p(X10) ) )
      | ! [X11] :
          ( ( big_p(X11)
            | ! [X12] : ~ big_p(X12) )
          & ( ? [X13] : big_p(X13)
            | ~ big_p(X11) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3)
          | ? [X2] : ~ big_p(X2) )
        & ( ? [X3] : big_p(X3)
          | ! [X2] : big_p(X2) ) )
      | ? [X0] :
          ( ( ! [X1] : ~ big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) )
          & ( ? [X1] : big_p(X1)
            | big_p(X0) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ! [X2] : big_p(X2)
          | ! [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) )
        & ( ? [X3] : big_p(X3)
          | ? [X2] : ~ big_p(X2) ) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ( big_p(X0)
            | ! [X1] : ~ big_p(X1) )
          & ( ? [X1] : big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( big_p(X0)
      <=> ? [X1] : big_p(X1) )
  <~> ( ! [X2] : big_p(X2)
    <=> ? [X3] : big_p(X3) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0] :
          ( big_p(X0)
        <=> ? [X1] : big_p(X1) )
    <=> ( ! [X2] : big_p(X2)
      <=> ? [X3] : big_p(X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0] :
          ( big_p(X0)
        <=> ? [X1] : big_p(X1) )
    <=> ( ! [X0] : big_p(X0)
      <=> ? [X1] : big_p(X1) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( big_p(X0)
      <=> ? [X1] : big_p(X1) )
  <=> ( ! [X0] : big_p(X0)
    <=> ? [X1] : big_p(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2DlvEIEQtw/Vampire---4.8_5213',x2126) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ( spl7_1
    | spl7_4
    | spl7_5
    | spl7_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f44,f41,f36,f24]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( big_p(sK1)
      | big_p(X3)
      | big_p(sK3)
      | big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( ~ spl7_1
    | spl7_2
    | ~ spl7_3
    | spl7_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f22,f28,f31,f28,f24]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X5] :
      ( ~ big_p(X0)
      | ~ big_p(sK0)
      | ~ big_p(X5)
      | ~ big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SYN375+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 17:23:38 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.16/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2DlvEIEQtw/Vampire---4.8_5213
% 0.62/0.84  % (5540)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5538)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5541)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5542)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5539)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5543)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5544)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5539)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.84  % (5543)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.84  % (5542)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.84  % (5540)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.84  % (5538)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)First to succeed.
% 0.62/0.84  % (5541)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.84  % (5544)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-5468"
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.84  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.62/0.84  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.84  
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)Memory used [KB]: 987
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.62/0.84  % (5545)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.62/0.84  % (5468)Success in time 0.473 s
% 0.62/0.84  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------