TSTP Solution File: SYN374+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN374+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 11:57:06 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.62s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (   1 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  182 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  218 (  84   ~;  90   |;  19   &)
%                                         (  18 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   8 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (  49   !;  26   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f74,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f32,f45,f60,f61,f63,f65,f68,f70,f73]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_2
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f72]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl6_2
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f71,f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : ~ big_p(X1)
    | ~ spl6_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( spl6_2
  <=> ! [X1] : ~ big_p(X1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_2])]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ( ! [X4] : big_p(X4)
    | ~ spl6_2
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f35,f27]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( ! [X4] :
        ( big_p(sK2(X4))
        | big_p(X4) )
    | ~ spl6_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( spl6_4
  <=> ! [X4] :
        ( big_p(sK2(X4))
        | big_p(X4) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_4])]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_2
    | ~ spl6_3 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl6_2
    | ~ spl6_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f30,f27]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( big_p(sK0)
    | ~ spl6_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( spl6_3
  <=> big_p(sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_3])]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f66,f43]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ( ! [X2] : big_p(X2)
    | ~ spl6_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( spl6_6
  <=> ! [X2] : big_p(X2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_6])]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( ! [X4] : ~ big_p(X4)
    | ~ spl6_1
    | ~ spl6_6 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f24,f43]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( ! [X4] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK2(X4))
        | ~ big_p(X4) )
    | ~ spl6_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( spl6_1
  <=> ! [X4] :
        ( ~ big_p(sK2(X4))
        | ~ big_p(X4) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_1])]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ( spl6_3
    | ~ spl6_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl6_3
    | ~ spl6_6 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f43,f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( ~ big_p(sK0)
    | spl6_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_2
    | ~ spl6_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl6_2
    | ~ spl6_5 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f40,f27]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( big_p(sK1)
    | ~ spl6_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( spl6_5
  <=> big_p(sK1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_5])]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ( ~ spl6_7
    | spl6_6
    | spl6_2
    | spl6_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f14,f42,f26,f42,f47]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ( spl6_7
  <=> big_p(sK5) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl6_7])]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X11,X8,X9] :
      ( big_p(X8)
      | ~ big_p(X9)
      | big_p(X11)
      | ~ big_p(sK5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ~ big_p(sK0)
          | ! [X1] : ~ big_p(X1) )
        & ( ! [X2] : big_p(X2)
          | big_p(sK1) ) )
      | ! [X4] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(sK2(X4))
            | ~ big_p(X4) )
          & ( big_p(sK2(X4))
            | big_p(X4) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( big_p(sK3)
          | ~ big_p(sK4) )
        & ( ! [X8] : big_p(X8)
          | ! [X9] : ~ big_p(X9) ) )
      | ! [X11] :
          ( ( big_p(sK5)
            | ~ big_p(X11) )
          & ( big_p(X11)
            | ~ big_p(sK5) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5])],[f6,f12,f11,f10,f9,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
   => ~ big_p(sK0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X3] : big_p(X3)
   => big_p(sK1) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ? [X5] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(X5)
            | ~ big_p(X4) )
          & ( big_p(X5)
            | big_p(X4) ) )
     => ( ( ~ big_p(sK2(X4))
          | ~ big_p(X4) )
        & ( big_p(sK2(X4))
          | big_p(X4) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X6] : big_p(X6)
   => big_p(sK3) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( ? [X7] : ~ big_p(X7)
   => ~ big_p(sK4) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( ? [X10] :
      ! [X11] :
        ( ( big_p(X10)
          | ~ big_p(X11) )
        & ( big_p(X11)
          | ~ big_p(X10) ) )
   => ! [X11] :
        ( ( big_p(sK5)
          | ~ big_p(X11) )
        & ( big_p(X11)
          | ~ big_p(sK5) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ? [X0] : ~ big_p(X0)
          | ! [X1] : ~ big_p(X1) )
        & ( ! [X2] : big_p(X2)
          | ? [X3] : big_p(X3) ) )
      | ! [X4] :
        ? [X5] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(X5)
            | ~ big_p(X4) )
          & ( big_p(X5)
            | big_p(X4) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ? [X6] : big_p(X6)
          | ? [X7] : ~ big_p(X7) )
        & ( ! [X8] : big_p(X8)
          | ! [X9] : ~ big_p(X9) ) )
      | ? [X10] :
        ! [X11] :
          ( ( big_p(X10)
            | ~ big_p(X11) )
          & ( big_p(X11)
            | ~ big_p(X10) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3)
          | ! [X2] : ~ big_p(X2) )
        & ( ! [X3] : big_p(X3)
          | ? [X2] : big_p(X2) ) )
      | ! [X0] :
        ? [X1] :
          ( ( ~ big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) )
          & ( big_p(X1)
            | big_p(X0) ) ) )
    & ( ( ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
          | ? [X3] : ~ big_p(X3) )
        & ( ! [X3] : big_p(X3)
          | ! [X2] : ~ big_p(X2) ) )
      | ? [X0] :
        ! [X1] :
          ( ( big_p(X0)
            | ~ big_p(X1) )
          & ( big_p(X1)
            | ~ big_p(X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( big_p(X0)
      <=> big_p(X1) )
  <~> ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
    <=> ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
        ! [X1] :
          ( big_p(X0)
        <=> big_p(X1) )
    <=> ( ? [X2] : big_p(X2)
      <=> ! [X3] : big_p(X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
        ! [X1] :
          ( big_p(X0)
        <=> big_p(X1) )
    <=> ( ? [X0] : big_p(X0)
      <=> ! [X1] : big_p(X1) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( big_p(X0)
      <=> big_p(X1) )
  <=> ( ? [X0] : big_p(X0)
    <=> ! [X1] : big_p(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rBuXes1537/Vampire---4.8_31584',x2125) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ( spl6_2
    | spl6_7
    | spl6_2
    | spl6_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f15,f42,f26,f47,f26]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X11,X8,X9] :
      ( big_p(X8)
      | ~ big_p(X9)
      | big_p(sK5)
      | ~ big_p(X11) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ( spl6_4
    | spl6_5
    | spl6_6 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f18,f42,f38,f34]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X2,X4] :
      ( big_p(X2)
      | big_p(sK1)
      | big_p(sK2(X4))
      | big_p(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ( spl6_1
    | spl6_2
    | ~ spl6_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f21,f29,f26,f23]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ( ~ big_p(sK0)
      | ~ big_p(X1)
      | ~ big_p(sK2(X4))
      | ~ big_p(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : SYN374+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 17:16:08 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.32  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.11/0.32  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rBuXes1537/Vampire---4.8_31584
% 0.62/0.77  % (31697)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31696)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31693)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31694)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31695)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31698)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31699)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31694)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (31699)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (31697)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (31693)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)First to succeed.
% 0.62/0.77  % (31695)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (31698)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (31696)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-31691"
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.62/0.77  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.77  
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)Memory used [KB]: 985
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.62/0.77  % (31692)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.62/0.77  % (31691)Success in time 0.447 s
% 0.62/0.77  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------