TSTP Solution File: SYN373+1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SYN373+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:30:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.49s 1.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (  46   ~;  40   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  10 sgn  21   !;  21   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( big_p(X0)
       => big_q(X0) )
  <=> ( ! [X0] : big_p(X0)
     => ? [X0] : big_q(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',x2124) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
          ( big_p(X0)
         => big_q(X0) )
    <=> ( ! [X0] : big_p(X0)
       => ? [X0] : big_q(X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
          ( big_p(X0)
         => big_q(X0) )
    <=> ( ! [X1] : big_p(X1)
       => ? [X2] : big_q(X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( big_q(X0)
        | ~ big_p(X0) )
  <~> ( ? [X2] : big_q(X2)
      | ? [X1] : ~ big_p(X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ( ( ! [X2] : ~ big_q(X2)
        & ! [X1] : big_p(X1) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ~ big_q(X0)
          & big_p(X0) ) )
    & ( ? [X2] : big_q(X2)
      | ? [X1] : ~ big_p(X1)
      | ? [X0] :
          ( big_q(X0)
          | ~ big_p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ( ( ! [X2] : ~ big_q(X2)
        & ! [X1] : big_p(X1) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( ~ big_q(X0)
          & big_p(X0) ) )
    & ( ? [X2] : big_q(X2)
      | ? [X1] : ~ big_p(X1)
      | ? [X0] :
          ( big_q(X0)
          | ~ big_p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ( ( ! [X0] : ~ big_q(X0)
        & ! [X1] : big_p(X1) )
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ big_q(X2)
          & big_p(X2) ) )
    & ( ? [X3] : big_q(X3)
      | ? [X4] : ~ big_p(X4)
      | ? [X5] :
          ( big_q(X5)
          | ~ big_p(X5) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X3] : big_q(X3)
   => big_q(sK0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X4] : ~ big_p(X4)
   => ~ big_p(sK1) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ? [X5] :
        ( big_q(X5)
        | ~ big_p(X5) )
   => ( big_q(sK2)
      | ~ big_p(sK2) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( ! [X0] : ~ big_q(X0)
        & ! [X1] : big_p(X1) )
      | ! [X2] :
          ( ~ big_q(X2)
          & big_p(X2) ) )
    & ( big_q(sK0)
      | ~ big_p(sK1)
      | big_q(sK2)
      | ~ big_p(sK2) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f10,f9,f8]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( big_q(sK0)
    | ~ big_p(sK1)
    | big_q(sK2)
    | ~ big_p(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( big_p(X1)
      | big_p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( big_p(X1)
      | ~ big_q(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X0] :
      ( ~ big_q(X0)
      | ~ big_q(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_q(X0)
    | ~ big_q(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_q(X0)
    | big_p(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X0)
    | big_p(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(sK1)
    | ~ big_p(sK2)
    | big_q(sK0)
    | big_q(sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    big_p(sK2),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    ~ big_q(sK2),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( big_q(sK0)
    | ~ big_p(sK1) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_54,c_55,c_53]) ).

cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_p(sK1)
    | big_q(sK0) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

cnf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    ( big_p(X0)
    | ~ sP0_iProver_def ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP0_iProver_def])],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
    sP0_iProver_def,
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_52]) ).

cnf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_q(X0)
    | ~ sP1_iProver_def ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[sP1_iProver_def])],[c_51]) ).

cnf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
    sP1_iProver_def,
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
    sP0_iProver_def,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_91]) ).

cnf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sP0_iProver_def
    | big_p(X0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_90]) ).

cnf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
    sP1_iProver_def,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_94]) ).

cnf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ big_q(X0)
    | ~ sP1_iProver_def ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92]) ).

cnf(c_105,plain,
    ( ~ sP0_iProver_def
    | big_p(sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_101]) ).

cnf(c_106,plain,
    ( ~ big_q(sK0)
    | ~ sP1_iProver_def ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_104]) ).

cnf(c_107,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_105,c_102,c_96,c_57]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SYN373+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  2 21:21:52 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.49/1.20  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/1.20  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------  iProver source info
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.49/1.20  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.49/1.20  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Parsing...
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...------  preprocesses with Option_epr_non_horn_non_eq
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Preprocessing...------  preprocesses with Option_epr_non_horn_non_eq
% 1.49/1.20   gs_s  sp: 6 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Proving...
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  clauses                                 6
% 1.49/1.20  conjectures                             6
% 1.49/1.20  EPR                                     6
% 1.49/1.20  Horn                                    5
% 1.49/1.20  unary                                   2
% 1.49/1.20  binary                                  4
% 1.49/1.20  lits                                    10
% 1.49/1.20  lits eq                                 0
% 1.49/1.20  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.49/1.20  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.49/1.20  fd_cond                                 0
% 1.49/1.20  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 1.49/1.20  AC symbols                              0
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------ 
% 1.49/1.20  Current options:
% 1.49/1.20  ------ 
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  ------ Proving...
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.49/1.20  
% 1.49/1.20  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------