TSTP Solution File: SYN372+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem : SYN372+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 23:55:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN372+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 02:58:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.35 Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.35 -h, -? prints this message.
% 0.13/0.35 -smt2 print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35 -m, -model generate model.
% 0.13/0.35 -p, -proof generate proof.
% 0.13/0.35 -c, -core generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.35 -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.35 -t:timeout set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.35 -smt2status display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.35 -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35 -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.35 -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.13/0.39 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.39 tff(big_p_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39 big_p: $i > $o)).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(tptp_fun_X_0_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39 tptp_fun_X_0: $i)).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(big_q_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39 big_q: $i > $o)).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(tptp_fun_Y_1_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.39 tptp_fun_Y_1: $i)).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(1,assumption,(big_q(Y!1) | (~big_p(Y!1))), introduced(assumption)).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(2,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (^[Y: $i] : refl((~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y)))) <=> (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y)))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(3,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y)))) <=> ![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(4,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (((big_q(X!0) | (~big_p(Y!1))) & ![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))) <=> ((big_q(X!0) | (~big_p(Y!1))) & ![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y)))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(5,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ((~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))) <=> (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y)))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(6,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ((~![X: $i] : (?[Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) => big_q(X)) => ?[Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) => big_q(Y)))) <=> (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y)))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(7,axiom,(~![X: $i] : (?[Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) => big_q(X)) => ?[Y: $i] : (big_p(Y) => big_q(Y)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','x2123')).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(8,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 6])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(9,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 5])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(10,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 5])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(11,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 5])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(12,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[11, 5])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(13,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 5])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(14,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (~![X: $i] : ((~?[Y: $i] : (big_q(X) | (~big_p(Y)))) | ?[Y: $i] : (big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 5])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(15,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ((big_q(X!0) | (~big_p(Y!1))) & ![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[14, 4])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(16,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[15])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(17,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[16, 3])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(18,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ((~![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))) | (~(big_q(Y!1) | (~big_p(Y!1))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(19,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ($false),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[18, 17, 1])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(20,plain,(~(big_q(Y!1) | (~big_p(Y!1)))), inference(lemma,lemma(discharge,[]))).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(21,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ((big_q(Y!1) | (~big_p(Y!1))) | big_p(Y!1)),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(22,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (big_p(Y!1)),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[21, 20])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(23,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (big_q(X!0) | (~big_p(Y!1))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[15])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(24,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (big_q(X!0)),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[23, 22])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(25,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ((big_q(X!0) | (~big_p(X!0))) | (~big_q(X!0))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(26,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 (big_q(X!0) | (~big_p(X!0))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[25, 24])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(27,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ((~![Y: $i] : (~(big_q(Y) | (~big_p(Y))))) | (~(big_q(X!0) | (~big_p(X!0))))),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.39 tff(28,plain,
% 0.13/0.39 ($false),
% 0.13/0.39 inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[27, 17, 26])).
% 0.13/0.39 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------