TSTP Solution File: SYN367+1 by Goeland---1.0.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem : SYN367+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:23:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN367+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 5 02:52:34 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.13/0.35 [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.13/0.35 [0.000040s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 Start search
% 0.13/0.35 nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.13/0.35 Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(! [X1_1] : (((p & big_q(X1_1)) | (~p & big_r(X1_1)))) => (! [X2_2] : (big_q(X2_2)) | ! [X3_3] : (big_r(X3_3))))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [1] ! [X1_1] : (((p & big_q(X1_1)) | (~p & big_r(X1_1)))), ~(! [X2_2] : (big_q(X2_2)) | ! [X3_3] : (big_r(X3_3)))
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [1] ALPHA_NOT_OR : ~(! [X2_2] : (big_q(X2_2)) | ! [X3_3] : (big_r(X3_3)))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [2] ~! [X2_2] : (big_q(X2_2)), ~! [X3_3] : (big_r(X3_3))
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [2] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X2_2] : (big_q(X2_2))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [3] ~big_q(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [3] DELTA_NOT_FORALL : ~! [X3_3] : (big_r(X3_3))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [4] ~big_r(skolem_X33)
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [4] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X1_1] : (((p & big_q(X1_1)) | (~p & big_r(X1_1))))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [5] ((p & big_q(skolem_X33)) | (~p & big_r(skolem_X33)))
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [5] BETA_OR : ((p & big_q(skolem_X33)) | (~p & big_r(skolem_X33)))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [6] (p & big_q(skolem_X33))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [7] (~p & big_r(skolem_X33))
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [7] ALPHA_AND : (~p & big_r(skolem_X33))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [9] ~p, big_r(skolem_X33)
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [9] CLOSURE : big_r(skolem_X33)
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [8] : ! [X1_1] : (((p & big_q(X1_1)) | (~p & big_r(X1_1))))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [10] ! [X1_1] : (((p & big_q(X1_1)) | (~p & big_r(X1_1))))
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [10] GAMMA_FORALL : ! [X1_1] : (((p & big_q(X1_1)) | (~p & big_r(X1_1))))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [11] ((p & big_q(skolem_X22)) | (~p & big_r(skolem_X22)))
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [11] BETA_OR : ((p & big_q(skolem_X22)) | (~p & big_r(skolem_X22)))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [12] (p & big_q(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [13] (~p & big_r(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [13] ALPHA_AND : (~p & big_r(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [15] ~p, big_r(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [15] CLOSURE : ~p
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [12] ALPHA_AND : (p & big_q(skolem_X22))
% 0.13/0.36 -> [14] p, big_q(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 [14] CLOSURE : big_q(skolem_X22)
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 [0.012130s][1][Res] 32 goroutines created
% 0.13/0.36 ==== Result ====
% 0.13/0.36 [0.012163s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.13/0.36 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------